nytel:
You are obviously an angry and bitter person. You have nothing of benefit to add to this discussion. You should be upbuilding your fellow appostates, not burdening them with negativity.
Shame on you!
believing is something you feel in your heart; exercising knowledge is something you do and actually requires no belief.
there is no need for an outside group to tell you how to go about doing this.
i can see that all that is truly required of you is that you believe jesus is lord, that his father raised him from the dead, that you love god with your whole heart, you love your neighbor as yourself, and you confess your beliefs to others.
nytel:
You are obviously an angry and bitter person. You have nothing of benefit to add to this discussion. You should be upbuilding your fellow appostates, not burdening them with negativity.
Shame on you!
what a bunch of wall paper.
99% of the people on this forum are hopelessly believers in one sided non-sense.
i am tired of the abusive language that has been dumped on me by otherwise respectable participants.
"One man's rationale is another man's absurdity"
what's your personality type?
take this test if you're not sure:.
http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/jtypes2.asp.
I have tested INFP 3 times with various incarnations of this test.
i was wondering what appeals to most about choosing to become a jw so i would like to leave you with some questions to answer (and yes this is serious q1.was it due to family q2.due to depression or loss of a loved one q3.looking for a purpose in life q4.everlatsing life q5.drugs or alcohol or mental illness q6.lack of bible understanding q7.easily persuaded q8.needed friends well thats alll 4 now i am just trying to find out what religious people have in common, because i seem to notice alot of religious people i know seem to have the same personality traits such as depression,mental illness,weird,very boring,insane,narrow minded,and you know the rest i guess?
Well, if you like to get it on with children, one reason to choose the witnesses is because you are almost guaranteed free-reign amongst the little ones. If one of the little buggers ever says anything, all you have to do is walk up to some two-bit elder, keep a straight face and categorically (sp?) deny that anything happened, remind them of the cherrished two-witness rule straight from the bible, and top it off with a threat to sue for slander if your "good name" is tarnished.
what a bunch of wall paper.
99% of the people on this forum are hopelessly believers in one sided non-sense.
i am tired of the abusive language that has been dumped on me by otherwise respectable participants.
proplog2 said:
Silent Lambs web-page is a reckless exhibition of opinion with no regard for "all-ness".What a damn joke. Bowen didn't put up his site to have a balanced debate on the validity of child molestation, he put it up to help victims of child molestation.
And quit this "all-ness" bullcrap. You're just pissed because of the bad light the WT/CCJWs are put in.
What is the big damn deal with going to the police to report possible child molestation instead of some bonehead elders REQUIRING TWO WITNESSES TO AN EVENT THAT HARDLY EVER HAS TWO WITNESSES!?
What? The Cong might look bad? Bad light on witnesses? SCREW THE CONGREGATION! Today's potential molestees could be tomorrow's potential molesters. Children are the future.
do you know of any judicial committee cases, were the victim brought a lawyer to defend him or something similar?
at least during the inquisition they could athough it was rear!.
looking foward for your comments.. joe
Then I would say:
"No announcement, no lawsuit".
do you know of any judicial committee cases, were the victim brought a lawyer to defend him or something similar?
at least during the inquisition they could athough it was rear!.
looking foward for your comments.. joe
How about this?
"No lawyer, no meeting."
Sounds good eh? :)
erica rodiriguez.
.
http://www.nypost.com/news/nationalnews/40039.htm
proplog2:
I don't trust the testimony of kids who have been coached and prodded by wacko psychologists.What wonderful logic. Please elaborate on how one knows when a kid is being coached and prodded versus a kid who has been molested. I hope for your sake you are referring to children with NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE to show they have been molested.
I guess you would just assume that they are little liars while meat-muffin butt-fucks little nancy in the bathroom then.
Can't say I'm proud to know you proplog.
do you want to know who the new witnesses will be, they don't even know themselves yet ?.
read all of chapter ezekiel 38 and psalm 83.
Hello Frenchy.
I have no idea. I just saw 'new' and 'witnesses' and scriptures about ezekiel and psalms and went with the feeling.
Figured I would entertain rather than be completely useless.
do you want to know who the new witnesses will be, they don't even know themselves yet ?.
read all of chapter ezekiel 38 and psalm 83.
MDS, what the hell are you up to now!?