Good points Amazing....
In my case since I'm Greco/italian origin, after leaving JW's I looked and in both Churches: The East and West Roman. Indeed there are many common things among the 2 Churches, but there are also 2 severe issues that makes them different.
The basic issue is the Filioque. The major issue occured with the translation from the Hellenic language to Latin, since the West Roman Church started to use Latin, instead of Greek. That is why the Orthodox Church still using the Original Greek Text of the Bible in the ceremonies in order to avoid any misunderstanding of the scriptures and their meaning. Greek language is so accurate on this and transtalions can lead to serious mistakes if you don't take consideration of the Greek Text. That is why the West Roman Church fell into serious mistakes and even more mistakes we can see in the Protestand Movement with thousands of sects, while the Orthodox Church had a very few schismas and kept the unity for all those years.
The other issue is the Pope and the way he wanted to have power upon the entire Roman Church. There is a complete different view from the Orthodox believers of the Patriach of the Orthodox Church and the way that the Roman Catholic Church glorifies Pope
Indeed the Orthodox Church is Synodic and the Bishops are all equal. The Ecoumenical Patriarch in Constantinople he is just the Presiding Overseer and holds no power upon the rest of the Bishops.
As for the subject there was no GB in Jerusalim. A close read of the account of Acts show the opposite. It was a Synodos and open door one!!! Plus Paul would have been disfellowshiped for apostasy since he disobey them and circumsised Timothy and the Church in Antioch are apostates too since the named themselves Christians without any GB approval in Jerusalim!!!
JustHuman14 formely known justhuman