FM used the phrase "low risk admission." That's it, exactly. By admitting the "error" of a few silly things, they are hoping to innoculate readers against pursuing any deeper, more significant inconsistencies or inaccuracies. And it's working, to some extent. My mother, who'se aware of my problems with how the Society uses scientific quotes, pointed this Yearbook blurb out to me as proof that the Society is aware of the "problem" and is correcting it. See? Everything's good now, you only have to wait on Jehovah.
YEAH, BUT it makes the most recent shoddy work in the latest 2010 Creation brochure even more reprehensible, IMHO, considering that the two projects had to be in the works at around the same time. "Let's distract the readers with our goofy little example of spider silk and they won't notice the omission of gobs of relevant context in our 'discussion' of how life began!"
"Tracing all things with accuracy"--Yeesh!! And keep a straight face at the same time...