Barbara, thank you thank you thank you. You are providing an invaluable service to every thinking person. I am stunned at the Society's heartless encapsulation of the situation as a single event performed by a JW that held no official capacity. Whoever wrote that is evil.
But here's something that perplexes me--why does the WT slavishly adhere to the two witness rule when it's part of the Mosaic Law and therefore, according to their interpretation, no more in effect than the prohibition against pork? To the best of my memory, it's not repeated in the NT the way the prohibition against blood is, is it? They treat it as if it is part of the law for Christians today (cherrypicking which parts of the ML they want to keep and which they want to ignore but that's beside the point). You'd think that the simple drive to survive would encourage "new light" on that matter.