The allegations are just soooo weird, that the elders must have had some dislike of the accused to
go to the point of defaming him without much proof.
In this board there's often a complaint about the two person rule the Society came up with in cases
of sexual abuse etc. But... in this case it seems these two elders went the other way and with little
but the story (incredibly strange story) of one person proceeded to defame another JW.
What's your take on the story... is it good to have two witnesses before making a big inquiry or
should someone be persecuted and accused on every strange hear-say that comes along.
Maybe some people actually believe to be true happenings whatever they themselves
conjured up in their minds. Maybe there's some psychological reason. Maybe it's like in the
Salem Witch trials where people got accused and hanged on another persons word.
Maybe the article is too long to interest anyone else on JWN to read it fully then comment.
Thanks MinisterAmos for your reply post.