I happen not to be a 7up red dot like minimus isn't neither.
(What? (-1)3=-3 :-)
Yeah, that's me.
in real life, i do not ask people questions.. i don't look like the avatar of minimus.. i am very personable and well liked.. and....i'm pretty discerning, should i say so myself..
I happen not to be a 7up red dot like minimus isn't neither.
(What? (-1)3=-3 :-)
Yeah, that's me.
* this thread is for the church and not to be used for debating christianity.
i would ask that those who are non-believers please respect the beliefs of others today.
thank you in advance.. for two millenia since christ's death, christians all over the world have been participating in what is known as the the last supper.
I attended the memorial this evening. I partook of the emblems.
As a "conscious class" member I boldly carried my Kingdom Interlinear Translation with me to the meeting.
It's good to remember our Lord's ransoming sacrifice and his resurrection.
most witnesses never could explain exactly who the "faithful slave" was (according to the society's explanation).
the resurection of the sodomites was another bewildering thing.
were they or weren't they going to be resurrected?
That an infant can stay seated quietly for two hours.
And if they cry or get squirmy they get "disciplined".
Now that's something I never quite understood.
if you had to guess what point of their teaching.
the governing body wants jws to really, really understand,.
24:45.. the comment highlights that because jesus "did not say that there would be a multitude of slaves scattered throughout the various sects of christendom.
are really old oooolllllllllllllddddddddddddd.
Late 50s and early 60s isn't very old. Some GB members lived into their 90s.
Can you see 30 more years of the status quo? Thirty years of holding the untenable line
that the end will come "soon", that the end is "imminent"? The current GB is really stuck
as another poster said. They're stuck in the nonsense that Rutherford and F. Franz developed
as doctrine.
It is true that the current hard line of "believe in us or you're dead at Armageddon" is
emphasized more and more, and for some of us this points to a desperate attempt to
keep their power over the R&F. But can they continue this for 30 years?
This one point is the "first domino", if it gets toppled other dominoes of the WT ideology
will come crashing behind.
if you had to guess what point of their teaching.
the governing body wants jws to really, really understand,.
24:45.. the comment highlights that because jesus "did not say that there would be a multitude of slaves scattered throughout the various sects of christendom.
If you had to guess what point of their teaching
the Governing Body wants JWs to really, really understand,
what would you say that would be?
So that there's no doubt about it, today's daily text is Matt. 24:45.
The comment highlights that because Jesus "did not say that there would be a multitude of slaves scattered throughout the various sects of Christendom. Instead, he clearly stated that there would be only one “steward,” or “slave,” whom he would appoint over all his belongings."
Jesus didn't say that there would be a religious publishing corporation either.
Anyway it goes on to assert that... "So as The Watchtower has often explained, the steward must represent the “little flock” of anointed disciples as a collective body, or group."
Isn't it amazing how the suppositions and assumptions of statements found in
WT publications can be so boldly, and brazenly, affirmed? This despite the fact
that there is absolutely no proof in the scriptures put forth to support their claims?
What today's text highlights is really the Governing Body's lack of shame in bragging
about themselves and making sure the "individuals" who might claim an anointing
kow-tow to their kooky doctrine. As lording it over Christ's sheep, they've become
an evil slave who mistreats the Lord's belongings.
***es11 p. 18, Thursday, February 3***
Who really is the faithful and discreet slave whom his master appointed over his domestics, to give them their food at the proper time?—Matt. 24:45.
After raising this question, Jesus then went on to say that this slave would be rewarded for his faithfulness by being appointed over all of the Master’s belongings. (Matt. 24:46, 47) Jesus, the “master” in the illustration, did not say that there would be a multitude of slaves scattered throughout the various sects of Christendom. Instead, he clearly stated that there would be only one “steward,” or “slave,” whom he would appoint over all his belongings. So as The Watchtower has often explained, the steward must represent the “little flock” of anointed disciples as a collective body, or group. In the context of Luke’s Gospel, Jesus had just referred to these ones. (Luke 12:32, 42) The “body of attendants,” or “domestics,” refers to this same group but highlights their role as individuals. w09 6/15 4:1, 3
note the home page..wow how it has changed.. jehovah's witness discussion forumthe place to discuss anything relating to jehovah's witnesses and the watchtower bible and tract society... or just make new friends!.
many of the posts have nothing to do with with jehovah's witnesses and new ones coming on this board would be turned off by the content of many of these off color posts.
foul inappropriate language which is not proper or suitable for exiting witnesses to visibly inspect.
the opening article of the new april 2011 wt starts by talking about israel abandoning jehovah.
"in one section of.
their camp, the israelites sawthe pillar of fire.
The only problem is how to identify (and commiserate) with the others.
maybe i'm naive or just plain stupid, but i believe what the mystery bethelite says.
also, i don't think it's out of the ordinary that mary was concerned about going to the bathroom in the kingdom hall.. remember, the elder at bethel who was arrested because he took pictures of people using the bathroom?
that was hard to believe but it was absolutely true.
The Johnny "cant leave the org" or his family gets DF is just too much to believe.
It doesn't sound like a Witness would ever say anything like that. If the WTS ever
did do such a thing it would spread like gangrene and publishers would lose trust
in Mamma WT. No, it just doesn't make sense.
announcement........ http://sixscreensofthewatchtower.com/upcoming.html.
we are all anticipating the return of the active bethelite ,johnny, who was hiding in a closet talking to us from the world headquarters of jehovah's witnesses.
link to jan.1,2011 call.... http://www.sixscreensofthewatchtower.com/conferencecall-1-1-11.html .
So Rick/Kool-aid Man says Johnny finally came online in the discussion at 3:30 am.
Whatta marathon of a chat that must have been. Like waiting for Godot.
What was surprising is Rick posted in another thread that Johnny didn't have anything new or different to say.
Well, that's a crusher! What exactly is Johnny going on at 3:30am about and why so late?
When is the conference discussion going to be posted online at Six Screens?
simon.
as most people seem to have worked out the private discussion and support part of the forum is not private beyond requiring a username.. today nugget and cantleave are having printouts of their posts in this section being used in evidence at their jc.. http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/members/private/204436/1/nugget-and-cantleave-are-no-longer-jehovahs-witnesses.
my suggestion is, if its possible, to create an invite-only section of the board for truly private support.. .
I don't like the idea of a little clique forming where only some are invited and others not.
If people want that kind of forum they can always start their own elsewhere.
JWN isn't FaceBook and it shouldn't become one.
I'd rather see a chat implemented where the
live help (not available) feature appears at the top right of this page.
A realtime chat would be a nice feature to add, people could use it for
getting help, counselling, or just venting. The chat wouldn't be archived
unless you cut and pasted to a text editor, that is the forum software
wouldn't keep track of the chat discussion, it would only be for realtime,
live, in the moment.