Cool! Can you post a link to where we can download it?
Posts by bohm
-
112the Watchtower, December 15, 2009 (PDF)
by possible-san inwell, the watchtower, december 15, 2009 (pdf) is downloadable now.. although i had stopped notifying of those pdf files here, am i good to notify you?.
.
http://bb2.atbb.jp/possible/.
-
-
-
160
Need help disproving 607BCE
by 2pink ini hope i am posting in the right board.. anyway, i am newly out of the org, and have a dear friend who i've been speaking to all along about my thought process/decisions.
she has been hesitantly receptive (how's that for confusing?!
lol) and when i brought up 607bce to her yesterday, she was truly intrigued and had not heard of this as a false date before.. she is still half in/half out, so i know she isn't going to do a lot of naughty independent research on her own.
-
-
bohm
scholar: What the heck, i will bite. You have read about the ca. 5000 buisness tablets that have been catalogized from the periode and show no sign of the 20 extra years. What is your oppinion on that?
By the way, i wrote a thread about daniel and two questions i had about the societys position. Perhaps you can help me there? :-). http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/jw/friends/183895/1/Two-simple-stupid-questions-about-607
-
63
Armagedden Suitcase
by Magwitch inmy mother let it slip the other day that all the families in their hall are putting together a small suitcase.
inside this suitcase are to be things that you will take with you if given a 5 minute warning that the great tribulation is starting and you need to leave your home.
my father seemed quite embarrassed that this slipped.
-
-
bohm
* The annointed need an iron rod to 'shepherd' the nations (se rev. 12:5 and various speculations by sadistic s&m-fantasising writers in the WT).
* ugly semi-local 90s clothes as featured in awake.
* If you are not of the annointed, palm branches to wave with when your standing before the throne in hea..EARTH! (rev. 7:9)
* Marshmellows. A convenient snack when your neighbours house is burning anyway.
-
160
Need help disproving 607BCE
by 2pink ini hope i am posting in the right board.. anyway, i am newly out of the org, and have a dear friend who i've been speaking to all along about my thought process/decisions.
she has been hesitantly receptive (how's that for confusing?!
lol) and when i brought up 607bce to her yesterday, she was truly intrigued and had not heard of this as a false date before.. she is still half in/half out, so i know she isn't going to do a lot of naughty independent research on her own.
-
-
bohm
2pink: This might seem silly, but after you have researched a bit and know the outlines of the various theories (for example the babylonian domination theory of 70 years of servitude (609-539) and about 50 years of destruction (587-539)) and the societys position, try just to sit down and read Jeremiah again. Take special care from about chapter 24 and onwards.
It is possible to find statements here and there (eg. in daniel, 2 kings) that seem to give some support to the WTS position, but you got to keep in mind that they are very brief, subject to interpretive bias and all refer back to jeremiahs profecy which give a very detailed picture that TOTALLY clashes with the societys position.
I was very surpriced at least :-).
Besides this, check out Alans excelent site: http://corior.blogspot.com, he deal with the evidence as presented in the societys litterature at great length.
-
160
Need help disproving 607BCE
by 2pink ini hope i am posting in the right board.. anyway, i am newly out of the org, and have a dear friend who i've been speaking to all along about my thought process/decisions.
she has been hesitantly receptive (how's that for confusing?!
lol) and when i brought up 607bce to her yesterday, she was truly intrigued and had not heard of this as a false date before.. she is still half in/half out, so i know she isn't going to do a lot of naughty independent research on her own.
-
-
bohm
Scholar, no, you cannot disprove a date, you can only prove and disprove something in mathematics. However, there is a mountain of evidence against your date, offering evidence against it. That is why no serious non-jw scholars support it, and your favorite JW BIASED scholar was completely torn to schreds by AnnOMaly on the last two threads on the subject. Instead of considering what she said, you resolved to add-hominem attacks and ran away with the tail between your legs.
And now you are back for more scholary wack-a-mole....
-
14
Which is worst cult---JW or Scientology?
by cameo-d indo these two cults have more similarities or more differences?.
is one any worse than the other?.
.
-
-
bohm
COLD STEEL: bait...must...not...bite...
Scientology is definetely worse. They started out, right from the beginning, with the intention of fucking their members up. They way they do mind control - for example loading the language - is simply on a whole other level.
-
10
Two simple (stupid) questions about 607..
by bohm inim researching the societys position on 607, and so far i got two questions i havent been able to find the answer to.
it is about the following scripture:.
in the third year of the kingship of je?hoia?kim the king of judah, neb?u?chad?nezzar the king of babylon came to jerusalem and proceeded to lay siege to it.
-
-
bohm
AlwaysHere: Thanks!. So is this the reason?:
Nebs first year is 624. Jehoiakims 3rd year is nebs 1st, so if one read daniel 1:1-2 directly, he would have been taken to jerusalem about 624. Which would add 7 years to his life according to society chronology? Is those 7 years the problem? (daniel get to old)
-
24
Everything You Wanted To Know But Were Afraid To Ask (t.f.d.s.)
by Son of Man inok, you read the topic so ask me and i will tell you as long as it is not too personal.
only sincere questions will get a response.. t.f.d.s..
-
-
bohm
Do you have a diagnosis for a mental disorder? are you (supposed to be) on any kind of meds?
-
10
Two simple (stupid) questions about 607..
by bohm inim researching the societys position on 607, and so far i got two questions i havent been able to find the answer to.
it is about the following scripture:.
in the third year of the kingship of je?hoia?kim the king of judah, neb?u?chad?nezzar the king of babylon came to jerusalem and proceeded to lay siege to it.
-
-
bohm
MKR, yes, yes! i am aware of this, but i still want to understand the societys position.
-
10
Two simple (stupid) questions about 607..
by bohm inim researching the societys position on 607, and so far i got two questions i havent been able to find the answer to.
it is about the following scripture:.
in the third year of the kingship of je?hoia?kim the king of judah, neb?u?chad?nezzar the king of babylon came to jerusalem and proceeded to lay siege to it.
-
-
bohm
ANNOMALY: Good stuff... here is a teaser quote to those who have not read the article: "They believe, with us, that the 6,000 years of permitted sin are to be followed by the 1,000 years of Christ's reign of righteousness. But whereas the true Bible chronology shows that the 6,000 years from Adam ended in 1873 (the very year in which the world-wide depression began), their erroneous chronology would show the beginning of the seventh millennium to be over one hundredyears in the future.". It is not strange Russell can write with such certainty. After all, it is GODS CHRONOLOGY as he write.
Still, this must be a slow day: I still dont get it... What part of their chronology fails if one assume Daniel was send in exile in jehoiakims 3rd year like Daniel 1:1-2 say?. Im not even trying to refute the societys position, just understand why on earth this particular butchering of history/scripture is required!