That's a good theory, I just don't see how you can do that.
Okay, Ali is wrong. What do you propose to do then?
so it is now two days after another islamic terrorist attack.
how many muslims are in the streets protesting and condemning this evil?
how many are marching in all the big cities condemning this in mass protests?.
That's a good theory, I just don't see how you can do that.
Okay, Ali is wrong. What do you propose to do then?
so it is now two days after another islamic terrorist attack.
how many muslims are in the streets protesting and condemning this evil?
how many are marching in all the big cities condemning this in mass protests?.
Well the question really is why do we want to save it? What does it add to humanity or civilization?
Very little, obviously outweighed by the harms... I don't want to "save" Islam at all.
I think Islam need to be annihilated or at least diminished enough not to be a threat for a few decades.
Assuming you are talking about something non-violent, I agree that the long-term goal is the diminishing of Islam as well as all other forms of harmful superstition. Where we disagree is with how that is accomplished. I agree with e.g. Hirsi Ali that the best way to accomplish this is from within, i.e. similar to how the Catholic Church of medieval time was reformed.
Having studied it a bit more, I also think that those seeking to reform it are well intentioned but doomed to failure. There zero evidence that it can ever be reformed or will ever be reformed and part of that is the obstructive behavior of the left to even having rational discussion on the matter.
I think that the existence of actual reformers such that Majiid Nawaz is an example that there are Muslims who are promoting a more benign form of Islam; at the very least I think it should be tried and these efforts supported. But okay, let's accept that Hirsi Ali or Majiid Nawaz got it all wrong with the idea we should and can reform Islam. We still got to do something:
If not reform, how do you propose we annihilate or diminish Islam?
We can't fix Islam because people insist on wasting all the time debating if there is even a problem with it (when there clearly is). People like you do that bohm when your ideological conditioning to deny all issues kicks in.
How can I convince you that I believe the things I write again and again?
so it is now two days after another islamic terrorist attack.
how many muslims are in the streets protesting and condemning this evil?
how many are marching in all the big cities condemning this in mass protests?.
well, to make it clear, 1, for obvious reasons (presumably, someone who does nothing or little of what Mohammed did is less Islamic than someone who tries to do much, by the common definition of the word Islamic).
I would recommend you to read the report. What do you think about her suggestion that there are moderate Muslims and reformers with whom meaningful alliances can be build?
so it is now two days after another islamic terrorist attack.
how many muslims are in the streets protesting and condemning this evil?
how many are marching in all the big cities condemning this in mass protests?.
Incidentally, Ayan Hirsi Ali has a recent report on radical Islam (she calls it political Islam) and the various branches of Islam which she too believes exists; these are incidentally the same distinctions as Bernhard Haykel makes in the work I shared earlier though he is more interested in the historical/political context and Hirsi Ali focuses on policy. I don't share her optimism with regards to Trump, but the distinctions she is making (and her analysis of contemporary Islamism) is exactly the same as those I am making on this thread. For instance, from the conclusion:
- The administration should recognize the diversity of Muslim citizens and support Islamic reformers here and around the world.
- In reaching out to the Muslim American community, the administration should ally itself with genuine Muslim moderates and reformers, not with “nonviolent” Islamists. Nonviolent Islamists are engaged in subversion: they seek to replace the US Constitution and rule of law with sharia
My point is that the idea that we can recognize people as both Muslims and moderates is one she shares. Do you believe she too is wrong?
http://www.hoover.org/sites/default/files/research/docs/ali_challengeofdawa_final_web.pdf
(Before she is quoted to "disprove" me, please keep in mind that save some optimism with regards to Trump what she is writing on Islam and Islams relationship to terrorism is in alignment with what I have written on this thread and elsewhere)
so it is now two days after another islamic terrorist attack.
how many muslims are in the streets protesting and condemning this evil?
how many are marching in all the big cities condemning this in mass protests?.
Simon: I did actually already answered that question when LUHE asked it of me.
I am confused about how I can participate in this thread but since you asked...
My answer was that I think it is wrong to treat Islam as a single entity, etc. etc., similar to how I think it is wrong to ask if the Catholics or the JWs are more like Jesus (you can point to ways they are similar and ways they are dissimilar). But if you want a simple yes/no answer then sure, I will go with yes.
i really don't know what to expect of this.
they are being labelled extremists in russia and are close to being banned.
so the show that they aren't extremists they encourage all jw's worldwide to bombard the kremlin and court with millions on letters..
The goal is not to affect Kremlin, which they can't in either case, but to use this as a PR opportunity. It is no coincidence that JWTV and their literature is so full of stories of JWs being oppressed in Russia under Soviet rule as this serves several purposes
Letter-writing is IMO quite brilliant as it makes it very personal to those who write these letters, the letters can be read on assemblies, and it makes it seem like JWs care more about other JWs than anyone else.
so it is now two days after another islamic terrorist attack.
how many muslims are in the streets protesting and condemning this evil?
how many are marching in all the big cities condemning this in mass protests?.
Simon: If you don't believe it as written, why not simply restate it? I would be happy to look for your question and try to answer it but quite frankly, I am confused as to what arguments and opinions on this subject and which are okay and which are off limits, and it does not make sense to continue a discussion which is against posting guidelines.
so it is now two days after another islamic terrorist attack.
how many muslims are in the streets protesting and condemning this evil?
how many are marching in all the big cities condemning this in mass protests?.
Ruby: I think that what people are objecting to about Islam is that ideas like child marriage shouldn't be in currency but that they are makes Islam reprehensible. I think this sort of reasoning is pretty cogent don't you?
Yes, as I have written many times, I think the Quran is full of things I find morally indefensible. But this is not the topic I raised several pages back, which was the assertion that good Muslims have to rape, something which I remain unconvinced of.
Since this or other of my views (although I am not sure which) are too controversial for this forum I cannot comment further. So much for open debate, I guess.
so it is now two days after another islamic terrorist attack.
how many muslims are in the streets protesting and condemning this evil?
how many are marching in all the big cities condemning this in mass protests?.
Muhammed also had 4 wives. Are all Muslims with less than 4 wives not good muslims?
What about female muslims? do they also have to rape? When did we prove that?
so it is now two days after another islamic terrorist attack.
how many muslims are in the streets protesting and condemning this evil?
how many are marching in all the big cities condemning this in mass protests?.
LUHE:
Agree that Muhammed was a pedophile according to the Quran, and pedophilia is widespread in the Arab world for that reason. But obviously, not all Muslims agree, as your sources indicate.
How does that prove that a good Muslim have to rape?
Why does a muslim become "non good" if he does not rape?