Plus there's all the vile, hate-filled and obscene speech Witnesses spew on the internet when they're not wearing suits and standing in front of a door next to an elder. Really makes them look good.
bluecanary
JoinedPosts by bluecanary
-
19
Another reason why the WTS warns JWs off the "net
by Lady Lee inwe know the wts says not going on the internet is for their protection.
yea yea i know.
we all know they just don't want jws to read all the real truth about the wts.. but what if there is another reason?
-
-
-
-
-
bluecanary
Congratulations!
I'm the smartest of the stupid people!!
If you weren't in a different country, I'd have to fight you for the title.
-
37
Lack of education does not = stupid.
by bluecanary in[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:worddocument> <w:view>normal</w:view> <w:zoom>0</w:zoom> <w:compatibility> <w:breakwrappedtables /> <w:snaptogridincell /> <w:wraptextwithpunct /> <w:useasianbreakrules /> </w:compatibility> <w:browserlevel>microsoftinternetexplorer4</w:browserlevel> </w:worddocument> </xml><!
[endif] in combatting cult mind control, steve hassan writes:.
in principle, i am against banning cults from college campuses unless they expressly violate rules of conduct that every student organization is expected to follow.
-
-
bluecanary
I don't think Steve Hassan's idea is possible
I agree. I think cult groups would do whatever they could to stop it. The government will never admit that mind control exists because then they would be accountable if someone accused them of it. I think that leaders realize that it's in their best interests for the masses to NOT have critical thinking skills.
-
37
Lack of education does not = stupid.
by bluecanary in[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:worddocument> <w:view>normal</w:view> <w:zoom>0</w:zoom> <w:compatibility> <w:breakwrappedtables /> <w:snaptogridincell /> <w:wraptextwithpunct /> <w:useasianbreakrules /> </w:compatibility> <w:browserlevel>microsoftinternetexplorer4</w:browserlevel> </w:worddocument> </xml><!
[endif] in combatting cult mind control, steve hassan writes:.
in principle, i am against banning cults from college campuses unless they expressly violate rules of conduct that every student organization is expected to follow.
-
-
bluecanary
Steve2, I agree that a lot of anti-witness literature is unconvincing. I find that people who have never been witnesses don’t know how to argue against it as effectively as people who’ve been there. If the high schools would even teach critical thinking skills (some probably do; mine didn’t) that would help.
Farkel, I agree with everything you say. I just wanted to draw attention to the distinction between lack of knowledge and lack of ability to have knowledge. There’s a difference between people with little education and people with low intelligence. The former circumstance can be rectified. It’s harder to compensate for the latter.
Parakeet, I see what you’re saying and I didn’t mean it about people using stupid in that sense. This was directed to those comments which are purposefully trying to put people down for believing in the WTS. I was dragged in from early childhood and I bought it. My mother feels stupid for buying it in her early 20s. We both had to be really shaken out of it.
But I did believe it and I think I am a smart person. I always had the best grades in school (ok, my school system sucked, so that’s not saying a lot) and I always considered myself a rational thinker in the b0rg. I told someone once that I was a JW because it was the only religion that made sense to me. Turns out I didn’t have all the information and hadn’t been trained to properly use my reasoning faculties.
Flipper, Amen! That’s exactly what I liked about being a Witness. Having all the answers.
-
10
Need help with letter on Blood
by wobble ini am thinking of sending a letter to the ethics committee of the british medical association with reference to their guidance to doctors etc.
and the treatment,or non-treatment of jw's with blood.. it seems to me that they just look at the persons mental ability to make a decision,and then respect it, my argument will be that capability alone is not enough,they need to know that the person has been given enough information to make a reasoned decision.. for instance, if someone refused a treatment on medical grounds,having only heard the negatives about such treatment, and none of the positives, would they feel happy in respecting that persons view?
is it ethical?or should not some attempt be made to educate the person fully,if they reject after that i would say then respecting their decision is ethical.. when it comes to a person rejecting treatment on religious grounds,does not the same rule of ethics apply ?
-
-
bluecanary
Wobble, are you suggesting that the decision to not accept blood should be taken out of people's hands or merely that they should be thoroughly informed but still able to make that decision? I'm in favor of the latter.
-
44
Let's start our own governing body
by bluecanary ininspired by dt's topic but meant to be entirely humorous.
let's nominate members to our own governing body.
they can each be head of their own department.
-
-
bluecanary
Mastodon, you can be head of the dept. of Star Wars only if I can have a personal tie fighter.
-
44
Let's start our own governing body
by bluecanary ininspired by dt's topic but meant to be entirely humorous.
let's nominate members to our own governing body.
they can each be head of their own department.
-
-
bluecanary
Parakeet: dept. of having an icon that, out of the corner of my eye, I always think is an avocado.
-
44
Let's start our own governing body
by bluecanary ininspired by dt's topic but meant to be entirely humorous.
let's nominate members to our own governing body.
they can each be head of their own department.
-
-
bluecanary
Inspired by DT's topic but meant to be entirely humorous. Let's nominate members to our own governing body. They can each be head of their own department. Here's my picks:
Leoleia—dept. of people way smarter than everyone else
Oompa—dept. of drooling over hot chicks
Cameo-d—dept. of there is a conspiracy here!
Yizuman—dept. of LOL kitties
Blondie—dept. of how does she stomach reading all that crap to comment on it?
All Time Jeff—dept. of bananas
WTWizard—dept. of celibacy
John Doe—dept. of dirty bastards
Spike Tassell—dept. of if you can't beat em, join em
Ms. Jones—dept. of oh snap!
Challam—dept. of somebody on here might as well be religious
SnakesintheTower—dept of who cares? I’m getting married!
-
3
The governing body have disassociated themselves by their actions...
by DT in...a new governing body needs to be elected.
i know this sounds like a joke, but i'm serious.. i'm sure you're thinking that would be nice, but it will never happen.
i believe it can and will happen.
-
-
bluecanary
I have nothing serious to say here so I'm going to take this:
On another thread we can start nominating potential candidates.
and run with it. -
37
Lack of education does not = stupid.
by bluecanary in[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:worddocument> <w:view>normal</w:view> <w:zoom>0</w:zoom> <w:compatibility> <w:breakwrappedtables /> <w:snaptogridincell /> <w:wraptextwithpunct /> <w:useasianbreakrules /> </w:compatibility> <w:browserlevel>microsoftinternetexplorer4</w:browserlevel> </w:worddocument> </xml><!
[endif] in combatting cult mind control, steve hassan writes:.
in principle, i am against banning cults from college campuses unless they expressly violate rules of conduct that every student organization is expected to follow.
-
-
bluecanary
Same here, Sylvia. I remember thinking "I agree with their conclusion, but not with how they arrived at it." What I didn't question was why on earth I agreed with their conclusion!