Farkel,
If you noticed I said that apostates 'give the impression' that Rutherford was a lunatic drunk who was in the 5th stage of alcoholism. The web pages portray him as insane drunk. Wouldn't you agree? The definition of an alcoholic is someone who 'is powerless over alcohol'. Do you feel that Rutherford was powerless over alcohol? Every human alive has something in their past that they would be ashamed of, heck, you guys even find fault with God! You apostates spend billions of hours digging up dirt on Watchtower leaders, getting into their sex lives and such. I just don't get it. I feel that if Rutherford was such a bad alcoholic as you all describe him to be, there would be a ton of evidence against him in support of your theory. It would be common knowledge in the witness community, and I sincerely doubt that Rutherford could have run the Society as a 'dictator' if he was a 'chronic' alcoholic. Where do apostates say on their web pages that he was a very mild, in control, alcoholic? The claims that are made is that he was a mad drunk.