Given their mindset - the proof is simple: He returned invisibly because he did not return visibly at the "correct prophetic time".
Manifestly simple - they simplycould not have been wrong about the date...
if jesus returned invisibly in 1914 how would anyone really know?
he was invisible.
ha!!.
Given their mindset - the proof is simple: He returned invisibly because he did not return visibly at the "correct prophetic time".
Manifestly simple - they simplycould not have been wrong about the date...
http://njfrogman.blogspot.com/2009/09/video-serena-williams-tells-lineswoman.html .
furthering the teaching that judgments are only for those outside the organization, serena williams threatened a line judge with a dose of jehovah's witness authority yesterday.
her comments were blasphemous, having been used in connection with "god".
Just goes to show what becoming involved in competitive sports will do to a good witness.
This will undoubtedly get used (at least from the platform, if not in print) as a "bad example".
Wonder if she gets a public reproof?
telegraph uk: charles darwin film 'too controversial for religious america'.
a british film about charles darwin has failed to find a us distributor because his theory of evolution is too controversial for american audiences, according to its producer.
creation, starring paul bettany, details darwin's "struggle between faith and reason" as he wrote on the origin of species.
There were (almost forgotten now) various semi-valid scientific theories which were precursors to Darwin.
Again, like that special on Einstein and God, this kind of speculation (Darwin doing the theory because he hated God over the death of the daughter) really cheapen his integrity as a scientist - which was in fact a great one.
It is sad to me to see Creationists stoop to attacks on the man himself (the ad hominem) rather than meeting the ideas scientifically.
This cheapens only Creationism, not valid scientific discovery.
telegraph uk: charles darwin film 'too controversial for religious america'.
a british film about charles darwin has failed to find a us distributor because his theory of evolution is too controversial for american audiences, according to its producer.
creation, starring paul bettany, details darwin's "struggle between faith and reason" as he wrote on the origin of species.
Probably nobody knows what really goes on in marketing of one of these "science specials", but I would suspect some promotional benefit in publicizing this kind of "America afraid of an evolution science special" nonsense.
Good grief - it is not as if we have not had all kinds of evolutionary science shows about Darwin before. And decades ago, the famous movie.
BTW, I was actually amazed to see this Sunday - on the other hand - a practically revisionist Einstein special in which they equated his resistance to the Heisenberg-style Quantum Theory (uncertainty principles) to a practically Jewish belief in "God". They seemed to take great delight in pronouncing Einstein dead wrong (and maybe senile) as a result of stubborn God-fantasies.
Einstein was not a religious zealot. His references to god were at most scientific euphamisms to the unknown and unknowable aspects of the cosmos.
she was 20 years old in 1914.. the honor now passes to a japanese lady at the age of 114..
She did look to be a pretty cool customer in that picture...
biblically speaking, god has many names.
marvin t. wilson, author of the book "yhwh in the bible, divine titles, names and attributes will be the guest on the telephone conference call "in search of truth" this coming saturday sept.12,2009 to discuss this subject.
since jehovah's witnesses insist on using what they say is the only name for god, jehovah, they may surprised to hear what marvin's research has discovered.
Haven't the witnesses themselves made a printed admission that probably Yahweh would be a closer English approximation to the unknown ancient pronunciation?
But in the same writing - they claimed that since "most of the world is used to calling it Jehovah" that this is what they are arbitrarily using.
she was 20 years old in 1914.. the honor now passes to a japanese lady at the age of 114..
You know - aside from that "generation of 1914 will not pass away" idiocy,
It is amazing what this lady was able to see during her lifetime - the first car (well, almost), the first airplane, WW1, WW2, (and all the rest), atomic energy (and bombs), computers, man walked on the moon, discovery of DNA, and so on...
she was 20 years old in 1914.. the honor now passes to a japanese lady at the age of 114..
Here is a link: Gertrude Bains
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32799091/ns/us_news-life/?GT1=43001
she was 20 years old in 1914.. the honor now passes to a japanese lady at the age of 114..
California. (of all places) - and here I thought that all the really old people on earth were in Tibet or Uzbekistan.
she was 20 years old in 1914.. the honor now passes to a japanese lady at the age of 114..
She was 20 years old in 1914.
The honor now passes to a Japanese lady at the age of 114.