It seems evident that the easiest and most direct
understanding of the various Biblical statements is that the 70 years began
with the complete desolation of Judah after Jerusalem was destroyed.
I assume that is the exact reasoning used (it seems evident from bible (scriptural) understanding) regarding what the word generation means
I assume that is the exact reasoning used (it seems evident from bible (scriptural) understanding) regarding organ transplants
I assume that is the exact reasoning used (it seems evident from bible (scriptural) understanding) regarding wether the people of Sodom and Gomorah will be ressurected for a 'second chance'
I assume that is the exact reasoning used (it seems evident from bible (scriptural) understanding) regarding blood transfusions, and the 'blood fractions' that are and are not acceptable
I assume that is the exact reasoning used (it seems evident from bible (scriptural) understanding) regarding celebrations of Christmas/Birthdays/etc
I assume that is the exact reasoning used (it seems evident from bible (scriptural) understanding) regarding the private sex lives of married JW's
I assume that is the exact reasoning used (it seems evident from bible (scriptural) understanding) regarding scriptural divorce, and what does and does not constitute grounds for such
Funny thing, is, and I'm sure there are people on this board that can add to this very small list that I made, all of the above (bible/scriptural understandings) have changed over the years...
The Governing Body claim that all the information they get is uninspired and just gathered from examining the scriptures themselves.. Yet every JW in good standing 'agrees' with however they interpret the scriptures. And when the scriptural interpretation changes (or in some case, not even a scriptural interpretation -- example -- beards) all the JW's re-read the scriptures, and say, yup, I agree that's what it says to me too... (or at least that is what the world is lead to believe)...
Would you state to me right now INFACTICALLY that if the INTERPRETATION OF THE DESTRUCTION OF 607 B.C.E for Jerusalem is changed by the WTBTS to some other date in the future, that you will leave the organization because you KNOW absolutely that they are false, and that you have researched for yourself and come to the conclusion all by yourself that the 607 date is correct. So correct in fact, that a change in that date will force you to DA yourself from the JW religion because you KNOW that is the correct date!!!
My guess is that you will not state the above, because you know in your heart that if the organization came out tomorrow and said, "upon reexamination of the scriptures, we conclude that Jerusalem was destroyed in 539 BCE" you would suddenly look back at the scriptures they used to arrive at the new date, and say, yup, I see that... Thank Jehovah for giving us new light...
So, my question then is, if you will not agree that a change in the date that you so elequently argued for is correct, no matter what the WTBTS states in the future (and indeed if the organization changes that date you will out of conscience DA yourself from the organization) , can you then explain to me how you are NOT following the dictates of men, just like Jesus warned the Pharisees about?
Edited by - ItsJustlittleoldme on 16 June 2002 16:41:9