The question is, what do you define as a "Thinker"? That would help people to meaningfully answer your question. Can you elaborate?
Secondly, I would agree that it makes little sense to engage in 'mindless ridicule'. One can only rightfully ridicule that which one actually knows reasonably well--otherwise, one would be guilty of making ignorant, broad generalizations.
To bottom line it, what's your point? What are you trying to prove? Where are you going with this? If you seek to interact with fellow Thinkers, it seems logical to present them with a specific Thought for discussion. It is the only way we can move forward to something that might be beneficial for everyone.
I engaged in efforts to converse with elders regarding some of my thoughts. I repeat it as often as possible, the words of an elder, "I could care less about 1914!" Yet, the JW belief in 1914 is at the heart of "this good news of the kingdom", as stated on page 279 of the book 'Benefit From Theocratic Ministry School Education'.
So, here is food for thought: how can an elder privately admit that he could care less about a key doctrine that is supposed to be the Bible's major truth for our time, yet expel a publisher for refusing to believe it? Is that evidence of thinking, or merely the hypocritical abuse of power?
Let's put on our thinking caps and answer that one, shall we?