Well, as an unbaptized born-in with a lengthy family history of involvement with the JWs, I don't think my experience is less relevant to any discussion of Jehovah's Witnesses.
No, I didn't choose to be a JW. If anything, that gives me both an insider's view of the doctrines and practices I was raised with, and also a sceptic's view, since obviously I challenged those doctrines and practices.
It also means that I had *NO* outside support when I refused to be baptized and eventually left. All my family were still JWs, and they put up a united front to show "Jehovah's loving discipline."
As in Nicolau's story, I was shunned by many members of the congregation and some members of my family. Even though I was never baptized, because I'd participated and been "above the age of reason" (yep, I stayed in the ministry school to keep the heat off until I was 16), I've been viewed as apostate by many. And some in the congregation still believe that I was disfellowshipped, even though I was never baptized. You know how JWs are; once they're convinced, they won't be troubled by little things like facts.
And it means that I had *NO* experience with what a normal life is like when I left. I had to learn all the basics on my own.
It also means that, not only do I have a difficult time dealing with people who were never JWs or don't understand why it's such a big deal to me (and no, it's *NOT* the same thing as being a former Catholic!), and on top of that, I take crap from *some* other ex-JWs who think my experience is somehow less relevant because I was forced into a cult as a child.
Jeez.
Jankyn