Again, what I stated about "two witnesses" does not accord with the standard in criminal investigations that are undertaken by law enforcement, but, in fact, is consonant with theocratic investigations that are undertaken by the body of elders in the congregations of Jehovah's Witnesses.
These "theocratic" investigations do not mitigate the legal obligation to report all suspected cases of child molestation. Hearing witnesses and conducting an "theocratic investigation" is not part of the legal mandate to report. Going "beyond what is written" in the law, using an amateur investigation as an excuse to not do what the law requires, is neither scriptural nor lawful.
Neither is it up to the elders to decide whether youths and "unbelievers" are credible witnesses. According to the 1991Pay Attention to Yourselves and to All the Flock elder's manual:
"The testimony of youths may be considered; it is up to the elders to determine if the testimony has the ring of truth."
"The testimony of unbelievers may also be considered, but it must be carefully weighed."
Molestation is a criminal matter. It is up to the courts to decide which witnesses are credible, not the elders. The elders' job is to report every case of suspected abuse to the legal authorities. That "we know what's best" attitude is exactly what I meant by "investigator, prosecutor, judge and jury".
Also from the 1991 Flock elders' manual:
"Christians are to pay to Caesar what is Caesar's and should obey the laws of the land in all matters where there is no conflict with God's law."
That is the point I was making: the WT sets its self above the law. They feel empowered to ignore the laws of the land if, in their own judgement, they decide some law should not apply. In this case, that law mandates reporting all suspected cases of child molestation.
It's ironic that they use Matthew 22 to justify ignoring the law. The context of this passage is that the pharisees were trying to get Jesus to say "Don't pay taxes to Caesar, disobey that law". But Jesus' answer says we are obliged to obey both God's law and Caesar's law.
what you and others here need to do is learn how to live quietly and to mind your own business
NO! That would make us culpable for the same offense, ignoring crimes against children! There is both a legal duty and a moral duty to report suspected cases of molesation. Protecting molesters is abetting their crimes, participating in their sins.
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." --Edmund Burke
If we do not speak out against those who hide the offenders, then we are tolerating their action. This comes under the "toleration" clause:
"A cadet will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do." --US Military Academy Honor Code