TR & others:
If you were thrown out for continued immoral sexual behavior, I would agree with your getting your butt kicked.
I agree to a point; well, maybe not that much. You said, "bad decisions come back to bite" us, and I think that's typically true. Sometimes it's difficult to say when and how that happens, but unwise decisions can payback with undesired results. However, as a religious body or organization, who sets the guidelines to bestow punishment?
For example, most religions believe it's wrong to steal. Some people have had their hand cut off for stealing a loaf of bread when they were hungry. The state law and religious creed bestows the punishment, but most of us disagree with this discipline. That's an easy one, but let's say a person steals a loaf of bread from your store every day, not because of hunger, but because he likes to steal. Now we're dealing with a bread-stealing theft; anyone willing to chop off his hand? Who do we trust to confer appropriate discipline in a religious community? The matter of stealing must be dealt with, but what's appropriate, and how do we know?
Before dealing with "immoral sexual behavior," it first needs to be identified. The Society got into trouble several years ago with their oral sex decree. What about a married man who has an affair; how many times can he sleep with another woman before it's one too many? What about a married woman; are the rules different? What about a man and woman sleeping together who are not married? What about two men or women in a loving relationship, and sleeping together? What about . . . and the list continues. Should any of the above be put to death? Why do we believe "sins of the flesh" are more heinous than other societal acts that are out of the norm?
Religions putting members out into the street for (name your sin of choice) are signing a death warrant in many situations. Yes, each person is accountable for their actions, but does that relieve us of reacting in a manner that harms others? Maybe it does, and if so, who makes up the rules, and who acts as judge? Would we trust that system to judge a member of our family? Are elders or any religious hierarchy able to judge fairly given the dogma they accept on faith?
These are rambling thoughts that come to mind. I'm very uncomfortable with them, and hope my comfort level doesn't improve over time.
JAVA, counting time at the Coffee Shop