Your question "is there truth in religion" is a bit vague.
Did Jesus rise from the dead? No
Did Mohammed ascend to heaven on a winged horse? No
Is there any truth or value in any aspect of religion? Probably.
i am asking this questions due to the teachings, beliefs and practices of different religions..
Your question "is there truth in religion" is a bit vague.
Did Jesus rise from the dead? No
Did Mohammed ascend to heaven on a winged horse? No
Is there any truth or value in any aspect of religion? Probably.
the reasoning behind the thread''s title was developed by a team looking at the teaching of evolution.
"the team, led by professor laurence hurst at the milner centre for evolution, university of bath hypothesised that since core concepts of genetics (such as dna and mutation) are so intimately linked to the core concepts of evolution, then priming students with genetics information might help their understanding of evolution.
more at: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/05/170523144131.htm.
If there was not one single fossil and no other evidence of any kind evolution would be proven beyond all doubt on the basis of genetics alone.
i mean blow their fucking brains out..
It would be unethical not to.
Nobody does it better...
this is new to me.. i was always taught things like "god is everywhere".. now the folks in warwick are tearing that into shreds with their spiritual enlightenment.. https://www.jw.org/en/bible-teachings/questions/god-omnipresent/.
god is able to see everything and to act anywhere he chooses.
(proverbs 15:3; hebrews 4:13) however, the bible does not teach that god is omnipresent—that is, present everywhere, in all things.
This has always been their doctrine. They think about god as being a thing in a specific place.
Russell used to teach his throne was in the Pleades cluster.
this latest attack in manchester u.k. targeting a venue attended by mainly children and teenagers who go to a concert by their favorite singer and then to be attacked by a terroist has to be the last straw... surely ?
22 dead at last count mainly young girls enjoying a concert of their favourite singer ?
and at least 50 others suffering injuries ?.
The total eradication of every vestige of the Caliphate would be an important step. It would be a huge psychological blow to the ideology that drives them.
anybody want to guess?
for some years the office for national statistics tried to hide the answer by counting different spellings as different names.
it no longer matters.
Karter - Douglas Murray looks at Enoch Powell's 1969 "Rivers of blood" speech in his new book.
His language handed ammunition to his enemies and provided cover for the extreme right. As a result it has made sensible debate about immigration almost impossible ever since.
anybody want to guess?
for some years the office for national statistics tried to hide the answer by counting different spellings as different names.
it no longer matters.
Skepsis - You say that "some of them are Muslim radicals". But for some reason you are not concerned.
Guess how many Muslim radicals are too many?
anybody want to guess?
for some years the office for national statistics tried to hide the answer by counting different spellings as different names.
it no longer matters.
Europe is in no way responsible for the Syrian civil war.
Syrian refugees make up a fraction of European immigration. Of course many young men from Eritrea destroyed their ID documents and claimed to be Syrian children.
anybody want to guess?
for some years the office for national statistics tried to hide the answer by counting different spellings as different names.
it no longer matters.
Just to be clear I disagree just as much with Dogon's ravings as I do with those he rants against.
This is the problem with discussing mass immigration. For too many people it is all or nothing/black and white.
Real life is more nuanced.
Not all Muslims are the enemy.