Really A chinese person who doesn't know what a fork is?
I have never eaten with chopsticks but I know what it's used for.
here are some quotes by the guy, from his youtube channel.
his name is stefan molyneux, and he’s apparently popular among the alt-right crowd.
he’s also widely quoted on these discussion boards, by certain ex-jws, who use him to help promote their political views.
Really A chinese person who doesn't know what a fork is?
I have never eaten with chopsticks but I know what it's used for.
here are some quotes by the guy, from his youtube channel.
his name is stefan molyneux, and he’s apparently popular among the alt-right crowd.
he’s also widely quoted on these discussion boards, by certain ex-jws, who use him to help promote their political views.
If their culture does not have Cesar Salad Dressing than most likely they are not going to understand this question and probably get it wrong
I have never heard of Napoleon beer but it is still easy to work that out.
The point is that IQ tests that matter do NOT use culturally dependent questions.
here are some quotes by the guy, from his youtube channel.
his name is stefan molyneux, and he’s apparently popular among the alt-right crowd.
he’s also widely quoted on these discussion boards, by certain ex-jws, who use him to help promote their political views.
But psychologists and neuroscientists don't restrict themselves to 'standard IQ' tests when doing serious research. They are aware of all the strengths, limitations and cultural biases of a whole battery of tests.
Average intelligence of ethnic groups of humans varies. It is measurable. A significant part of the difference is genetic.
None of these well-established - if inconvenient - facts provides any reason to make a judgement about any individual within a group or to treat anybody without dignity or respect.
Molineux is a Libertarian - IMO one step away from psychopath.
march 10, 1876: “mr.
watson —come here—i want to see you” the voice of alexander graham bell is transmitted.
he wasn't the first to invent it but the first to own a patent.. in 1910 telephone "subscribers" had 4 digit telephone numbers.soon, larger cities had 5 digit numbers.mark twain was one of the first to have a phone in his home.. the first phones had no dials or buttons.
I used to fix these sort of telephone exchanges for a living.
They were called Strowger after the funeral director who invented them. His rival's wife worked at the old manual exchange and passed on all the work to her husband.
I worked on the new electronic exchanges during my last year in BT.
here are some quotes by the guy, from his youtube channel.
his name is stefan molyneux, and he’s apparently popular among the alt-right crowd.
he’s also widely quoted on these discussion boards, by certain ex-jws, who use him to help promote their political views.
Sugar - So no interest in confronting actual facts then? Typically your reaction is to run away shouting insults over your shoulder as you go.
Science is NOT the enemy of equality and fairness. Quite the opposite. The mistake many make is to try to base their desire for equality on science-denial. That is a foolish strategy.
There are very good objective reasons to treat everybody fairly without lying to ourselves. In the long run they are more stable reasons too.
IQ research is full of so much bias as to make the whole concept of measurable intelligence a joke.
Utter nonsense.
now that we have stepped away from the jw faith, how do you feel about the bible itself?.
what about those awkward sections of scripture?
how did you rationalise or justify those sections?.
Slavery - not the arrangement of one Israelite to another, but the full-blooded slavery where gentiles could be owned by Israelites as heritable possessions and effectively beaten to death.
The bible's failure to condemn the principle of one human owning another rules out any possibility that it is worthy of respect.
here are some quotes by the guy, from his youtube channel.
his name is stefan molyneux, and he’s apparently popular among the alt-right crowd.
he’s also widely quoted on these discussion boards, by certain ex-jws, who use him to help promote their political views.
Sugar - I'm confused about what your point is.
Are you denying the scientific conclusion that intelligence is strongly heritable?
There is still some debate about whether the genetic factor affecting variation in intelligence is nearer to 50% or 70% but there is no serious dispute that variation in intelligence is significantly genetic.
Of course it goes without saying that a person with a genetic gift for high intelligence won't flourish without a suitable environment - 'nature via nurture' as Matt Ridley expresses it.
Just as an individual with the combination of genes for higher than average height won't achieve that potential without proper nutrition. On the other hand no amount of protein will cause somebody with the genes for less than average height to grow to 6' 4".
IQ tests are not perfect but they are very good, and if you research the literature you will find that scientists go out their way to compensate for social factors when measuring groups. The commonly high IQ of Asian kids is not explained by pushy parents.
when the world shuns jws because of difference of opinion, it is described as the action of satan.. when jws shun others because of difference of opinion, it is described as theocratic action.. such confused mind is at the root of getting wrong teachings.
jws shun anything what anyone would rate as the best of the bible or christian traditions:.
1)cross (with a longer descending arm) is the symbol of controlling the less powerful (“acts of the flesh”) with the more powerful (“spirit” within)—galatians 5:17, 19, 25.
God of the Universe who is begging help from his fallen/weak children so that God Almighty may be empowered to give an answer to the taunt of Satan
That would be a pathetic excuse for a deity. Personally I would have just told Satan to fuck off.
here are some quotes by the guy, from his youtube channel.
his name is stefan molyneux, and he’s apparently popular among the alt-right crowd.
he’s also widely quoted on these discussion boards, by certain ex-jws, who use him to help promote their political views.
Sugar Shane - the facts in no way depend on the work of one scientist.
The heritability of IQ is no longer disputed by scientists. It is still denied by well-meaning sorts writing social 'science' blogs.
here are some quotes by the guy, from his youtube channel.
his name is stefan molyneux, and he’s apparently popular among the alt-right crowd.
he’s also widely quoted on these discussion boards, by certain ex-jws, who use him to help promote their political views.
In other words, it’s nuture and not nature
The idea that variation in intelligence between individuals is more to do with parental environment rather than genetics is a historical curiosity.
The debate is whether intelligence is 50% or 70% inheritable. All attempts to account for environmental factors can get it down a few points but not by much.
Identical twins raised apart are highly similar; identical twins raised together are more similar than fraternal twins raised together; biological siblings are far more similar than adoptive siblings raised together who are no more similar than two individuals chosen at random.
The heritability of intelligence increases with age typically rising to about 80% - Yes you do turn into your parents!
It would be strange if average IQ didn't vary between different ethnic groups but so what? We need to accept the science and find other reasons to treat everybody with dignity and respect.