Posts by notverylikely

posted

109
Feb. 15 Study WT - More creationism and stupidity - A response
by eric356 in
1. watchtower
2. bible
well, the wt is back on it: "today, there is a rising tide of atheistic and evolutionist propaganda dependent on flawed and baseless reasoning.

we should not let this flood of faulty thinking confuse or intimidate us.

" (pg.
notverylikely

Go ahead, then.
Read the links I posted. Evolution is observed in action rather frequently these days.
109
Feb. 15 Study WT - More creationism and stupidity - A response
by eric356 in
1. watchtower
2. bible
well, the wt is back on it: "today, there is a rising tide of atheistic and evolutionist propaganda dependent on flawed and baseless reasoning.

we should not let this flood of faulty thinking confuse or intimidate us.

" (pg.
notverylikely

I never joke. Can you prove evolution?
Yes, yes, yes and yes..
35
I might get a brand new truck.
by asilentone in
1. jw
2. friends
i googled about getting one with the longest beds.

i do not see any list of trucks with longest beds.

do you have any recommendations for me?.
notverylikely

notverylikely, you have not prove it yet!
You didn't ask for proof.
35
I might get a brand new truck.
by asilentone in
1. jw
2. friends
i googled about getting one with the longest beds.

i do not see any list of trucks with longest beds.

do you have any recommendations for me?.
notverylikely

I have a challenge for you by the way, can you find a list of brand new trucks with the longest beds? If not, shut up!
Yep. Took me less than five minutes. Since you couldn't, I guess you have to shut up now.
171
Blog Update
by brotherdan in
1. jw
2. friends
just wanted to let anyone interested know that i've posted a couple new blogs.

http://jwcritic.blogspot.com/.

.
notverylikely

Kinda feel like Dan took a big Cleveland Steamer
I dunno, it felt more like an Alabama Hot Pocket to me.
171
Blog Update
by brotherdan in
1. jw
2. friends
just wanted to let anyone interested know that i've posted a couple new blogs.

http://jwcritic.blogspot.com/.

.
notverylikely

Curtains, any responses?
171
Blog Update
by brotherdan in
1. jw
2. friends
just wanted to let anyone interested know that i've posted a couple new blogs.

http://jwcritic.blogspot.com/.

.
notverylikely

Watch out for NVL. He's full of logic.
And independent thinking! That's the dirty word.
I always mentally switch statements like "he is ignorant" to "he is acting in an ignorant way"
Sorry if I misrepresented your point.
That is exactly the way in which I intended it.
171
Blog Update
by brotherdan in
1. jw
2. friends
just wanted to let anyone interested know that i've posted a couple new blogs.

http://jwcritic.blogspot.com/.

.
notverylikely

agreed notverlikely and thats what you were doing
Just did. The ignorance comment had nothing to do with your other assertions, it was isolated to your judging comment. I stand by my comments that taking a position of strongly judging on the way out of a cult that restricts your ability to learn is judging in ignorance. That's not calling you stupid or attacking your character in any way. If I were to start judging the worth of antiques I would be doing so in ignorance. Ignorance simply means not having knowledge of a subject. It is easily remedied.
Having said that, the burden of proof regarding Paul's words and the frequency of atheists during the early christian era is still on you.
171
Blog Update
by brotherdan in
1. jw
2. friends
just wanted to let anyone interested know that i've posted a couple new blogs.

http://jwcritic.blogspot.com/.

.
notverylikely

I don't think calling someone ignorant should always be considered personal attack.
I did not say HE was ignorant, just that the idea of strongly judging to be discriminate on your way of a cult is judging in ignorance.
Of course, that had nothing to do with his assertions regarding what Paul wrote or first century atheists.
171
Blog Update
by brotherdan in
1. jw
2. friends
just wanted to let anyone interested know that i've posted a couple new blogs.

http://jwcritic.blogspot.com/.

.
notverylikely

I submit Pauls words above at timothy as evidence for starters
That won't work. Paul is talking about those with a form of godliness. By definition, that can't be atheists. Adding your own interpretation and words that aren't there is not evidence.
ad hominem fallacy notverylikely
No it isn't. An ad hominem attack would be an attempt to discredit your position by attacking you asa person.