and if you don't mind, I think you and I should call this a draw and simply agree to disagree.
No. This was not a draw. It wasn't a fight or a competition where one side wins or loses.
I think those who know what you know and so think like you do will understand and identify with what you're saying... while those who know what I know... and so think like I do... will understand and identify with what I'm saying.
Yes and no. Those that speak science and math have specific terms to avoid confusion and to speak precisely and accurately. People that speak in theological terms often can't even agree on what they are talking about. For example, look at the thread on Langston Hughes where you said his experience was wrong because it did not match yours.
however... my... ummmm... "Chinese"... appears to be grating on your nerves.
You keep saying you are getting on my nerves. I know it's convenient to say that and then bow out of the discussion, but once again, I am not mad or upset, I am utterly sad at the state of education of people with regard to basic science and math when they try to talk about and argue about it.
I mean, that sometimes there are no words in one language to describe the words of another... or perhaps the speaker doesn't know how to properly conjugate his/her verbs, etc., whatever... and so when one speaks one sounds to the native as if "butchering" that one's language.
I understand your language perfectly well. Where it went sideways was when you tried to wedge science into your theology when you didn't understand it and then argued with and misunderstood the corrections and then tried to wedge THAT into your theology.
Since, by your estimate, I apparently don't know enough "French" to, well, even have a conversation (with anyone, apparently, though for some reason you assume it was only with you)
There you go, assuming what you you know that I think. You keep doing that and keep getting it wrong. Please do not do that.
and since you don't know, well, ANY "Chinese" (I know, I know... you believe you do, but, truly, just because there's a few "pings" and "pangs" does not mean it's "Chinese" (again, no offense - just hypothetical)
I understand theology quite well. I understand that you get your theology from dreams and voices and it regularly changes and that you disregard the bible when it suits you. Trying to have a thological discussion with you is like trying to nail jello to a wall since whenever you get backed into a corner you have a dream or an update from a voice and your position changes or you just ignore the discussion. No offense, but I've seen you do that more than once. Again, no offense, I think you are amazingly sincere and brave for speaking up the way you do, but...
we should probably leave off our discussion
... case in point. And again...
Until then, however, I have to move on. Because I believe my point was made
... there it was.
So...what exactly was your point?