At the end you say it's absurd to justify the killing of children but at the same time, in the paragraph above it, you typed out a defense of God's children killings using an example and everything.
I was giving hypothetical examples as to WHY God would allow children to die. People wanted a reason, so I gave a possible reason. It may or may not be true. But I don't PERSONALLY justify HUMANS killing children.
I defend God because the Bible commands it. It allows us to question God (many of the ancient patriarchs and prophets did), and I never said we cannot question Him. But what I HAVE said is that it is God's right to do what God will do. It is his RIGHT. I said that in our limited understanding how can we presume to know exactly why God did what He did? We don't have all the facts. We don't know what He foresaw in the future that would happen if he did not give the commands that He gave.
What is your obession with God's defense anyway? God will be fine, Dan.
I'm not doing it for God's benefit. He doesn't need me. If He DID need someone, it would be someone a whole lot more qualified that I am. But the Bible says at 1 Peter 3:15 - "But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect"
Now I have not always had an easy time of the last sentence...but I'm trying.