'Shad-rak' instead of 'shay-drak' --- this one always bugged me especially when I would go out of my way to pronounce it in a meeting and then a bro or sis would comment right behind me and say it the wrong way and emphasize it like I was the one who butchered it.
Jourles
JoinedPosts by Jourles
-
62
Words Jehovers Witnesses Pronounce wrong...
by vomit injehover being the most obvious.
why was there a group in every hall that pronounced some words like a bad english accent.
also why is it pretty universal, i.e.
-
-
-
25
Google earth adds Crises in Darfur, you must check this out
by needproof inanybody not yet familiar with google earth should try it, www.earth.google.com - offers maps and satellite images for complex or pinpointed regional searches.
recently google have added satellite shots of sudan, where a mass genocide is taking place whilst we go to bed each night in our safe and sound environments (relatively).
up to 300,000 people dead so far - why the hell doesn't blair or bush do something about this seeing as though they are so beset with helping other people (bs)... .
-
-
Jourles
why the hell doesn't Blair or Bush do something about this seeing as though they are so beset with helping other people (bs)...
Because it is much more important to focus American/British efforts in exposing to the world that Iraqi fighters are being trained in Iran on how to fight and use EFP's against our
occupationalliberating forces. American troops are in danger, man! Priorities!I sure hope we attack Iran very soon before '09. Beyond that, the anti-war democrats will likely be in charge -- and you know how far diplomacy gets us in the world. Our window of opportunity is shrinking fast so we need to use the evidence we have obtained thus far and blaze a trail of American "Blood & Guts" Glory into Tehran. Let's kick some Iranian ass! Screw Darfur.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Jourles
Warlock,
Passionate or not, if these two were not on TV and instead in the back coffee room, someone would have left with a blackeye. That is unless, they agreed beforehand to "pick a fight" with each other to boost ratings and to get "everyone talking about it" as we are doing here right now on a jw board.
-
-
-
Jourles
I wonder if Stephen Colbert will have something to say about "Papa Bear" next week?
My favorite part of The Daily Show is where they make fun of other news networks in how they cover an event. If you were to watch these other networks exclusively, you probably wouldn't notice the sheer sensationalism that they bring to the tube. But when TDS shows clips from all of them and how they make a circus out of one big news item, I think to myself - "Have we really sunk this low in our country?" The same people who love Jerry Springer will probably love this Rivera/O'Reilly clip.
Yeah, I prefer to get my news from the web and then finish up the day with TDS and The CR to help me sleep with a grin on my face. Watching the clip above only got me in a pissy mood and made me want to punch someone.
-
-
-
Jourles
And some people ask me why I prefer to watch The Daily Show. At least I don't have to watch this crap.
When both sides have to resort to shouting and yelling, it is no longer a dignified debate. What a waste of TV programming.
-
21
rantings on jw fellowship board
by gspradling ined-->some thrilling experiences that just goes to show jehovah knows:
does jehovah know what is going on, and does he help?
1. the bomb planted in the kingdom hall in australia, where one brother was killed, was meant to kill everyone, and would have; but the bomb rolled backwards so the force or the blast was away from the friends, rather than aimed at them
-
-
Jourles
1. The bomb planted in the Kingdom Hall In Australia, where one brother was killed, was meant to kill everyone, and would have; but the bomb rolled backwards so the force or the blast was away from the friends, rather than aimed at them
How do they know the bomb "rolled backwards?"
2. A new Hall was built in Brooklyn. However, a large tree was inconveniently located in the center of the parking lot, and a city ordinance forbade it's removal. That night, a storm blew it down, and it conveniently fell in the middle of the street. No harm came to the Hall. Because it blocked the street, the city of New York had to remove it, at no expense to the brothers.
Was there a news clip of this happening? Or was it a word-of-mouth story?
3. In Florida, a Hall building was delayed, because the basement hadn't been back filled and the brothers had no means to do so. While the inspectors were at the site, a bulldozer showed up, did the job, and drove off. He returned to tell his boss he'd finished the job at the Hall. The boss replied, "Hall!? I told you to go to the mall!" The job was done at no expense to the brothers.
Basement in FL? LOL! Besides, did the bulldozer's boss tell him to go to the "Kingdom Mall?" How else would someone(supposing he's worldly) know to go to the Kingdom "Hall?" If I was told to go to the "hall," I would need a little more info to go on.
-
20
I Have Reached the Pinacle
by XJW4EVR ini saw all the hubbub you folks were making over the memorial, and for the first time in my life since leaving the j-dubs, i had no desire to even go.
as recently as last year, i gave thought to going, but usually did not.
this year it came and went and i never gave it a thought.
-
-
Jourles
I found that my pinnacle was reached as soon as my wife stopped crying and pouting because I wasn't going. This year, she got dressed, asked me about her shoes, and left. Waaay easier than a couple of years ago.
-
28
US military buildup on the Iranian border...
by zeroday inmoscow, march 27 (ria novosti) - russian military intelligence services are reporting a flurry of activity by u.s. armed forces near iran's borders, a high-ranking security source said tuesday.
"the latest military intelligence data point to heightened u.s. military preparations for both an air and ground operation against iran," the official said, adding that the pentagon has probably not yet made a final decision as to when an attack will be launched.
he said the pentagon is looking for a way to deliver a strike against iran "that would enable the americans to bring the country to its knees at minimal cost.
-
-
Jourles
I'm still trying to figure out which excuse the US will use to attack Iran:
- Iran allegedly fires missile at US aircraft in "Iraqi" airspace.
- If the Russian's intel of the US attack date of April 6th is true, expect the Iranians to release the sailors within the next two days. This will be one less excuse to "free the hostages." Iran will say that the sailors "apologized" - which will be good enough for them, even though Britain didn't do it officially.
- An "Iranian" ship will allegedly fire on a US ship.
- The US finds and proves "beyond a doubt" that Iranian Revolutionary Guards were just fighting against US soldiers in Iraq.
Iran isn't doing anything to the US right now that warrants a full scale war with them. Developing nuclear technology is their right under the NPT. It doesn't matter what many feel in their "gut" about them deveolping a nuke to deliver on US soil or how many UNSC resolutions get passed at the behest of the US. The IAEA has found no evidence of nuclear weapons facilities. Deal with it.
Seeing that Iran is basically keeping to themselves right now(aside from the sailors in disputed waters), the only way the US could mount a "legal" attack on them would be to have one of the above scenarios happen. Of course, there are many other scenarios that could be played out, but the US public(and world) will need something far more convincing this time. The world will need to see "proof"(fabricated or not) of Iran attacking US forces. I can't believe the democrats stripped out of their latest bill a line that would have made it necessary for Bush to get approval from Congress before attacking Iran. This makes me wonder if we're just seeing a massive game of good cop/bad cop being played out in Washington.
The only way for Iran to change back to the dollar in oil trading is to have a US friendly regime set up. We've got two years to watch this happen.
-
5
Does this scare you?
by Mile 0 ini've been hearing more and more talk from the christian right on cable evangelical tv that i find particularly disturbing.
i actually heard this evangelist suggest that a nuclear strike by israel/u.s./britain against an arab/muslim country would be a fulfillment of the revelation prophecy about "the eyes rotting out of their sockets" etc.
i guess i just don't like the idea of influential tv evangelists endorsing what would i would call the launching of ww3.. do you think a pre-emptive strike against iran would be seen by the christian right as the beginning of the big "a", led by israel with backing of u.s. and/or britain, in fulfillment of bible prophecy?.
-
-
Jourles
Something in my gut tells me that Bush really wants to be a main player in his view of how armageddon will be played out. If we make it past 2008(when he's gone) without any large scale military conflict between two major countries, I will not only be shocked, but also relieved.
We need less religiously inclined political figureheads in power -- across the board.