BTS: Is a cockroach life as valuable in his eyes as a human one?
Mmm, naturally I'd say no. But I think it's a valid question - why DOESN'T a cockroack deserve to live out it's life as much as I do? I've asked myself that a number of times about different species all the way down to mosquitoes (for which, I'm a serial killer). So far I've come up with a very weak life-span argument to make myself feel better but it's just that - weak. I really don't know.
I'm no monk but I believe I should be able to give a well thought-out reason as to why one species' life is worth more/less than another and I think it should stand apart from commonly-held bias. "That's the way it is" and "we've always done it that way" need not apply.
I'm not debating just to debate. I'm really trying to assess my own thinking here. I love a thick, juicy steak. There's no hidden agenda where I want to give up meat or take down the beef industry.
Woods: I am not trying to piss you off, SBC.
No pissage here, Woods.
Woods: I am just saying that the value of a human is greater than the value of an animal. Just that simple.
Just that simple to you, perhaps. But you also ignored my hypothetical questions about higher life forms killing humans for food or about the value of H. erectus/habilis if they walked the earth today. It's easy to wave off something like this as trivial or silly when you sit at the top of the food chain. But what if that wasn't the case?
This, to me, is a tricky issue because it presents some moral ambiguity in my mind. We would like to think we are moral and ethical creatures. And in some ways we seem to be. But when it comes down to it I'm beginning to wonder if we're just self-aggrandizing animals. Maybe I'm guilty of moral preening after all.