"....Those who simply leave the faith are not shunned. If, however, someone unrepentantly practices serious sins, such as drunkenness, stealing, or adultery, he will be disfellowshipped..."
This is half-true. If you simply drift away, you won't be DF'd, but if you disassociate yourself, yes, you are treated just like a disfellowshipped person, as they don't view that as just "drifting away". To them, you've stood up and said "I don't want to be known as a JW anymore." The Society views that almost as the same as apostacy.
What is really outrageous though, are the REASONS why so many are disfellowshipped. When you read the scriptures, it says that "anyone who is called a brother" who is a drunk (guess that means 99% of the elders should be DF'd), an adulterer, a fornicator, a greedy person, a thief, etc. etc. should be "as a tax collector".
I don't recall any scripture that says you can disfellowship someone for questioning certain teachings of the GB though. Doesn't the scriptures say "....make sure of all things...."??? Guess that doesn't apply to the rank and file Witness.
Therefore, to me, they have no grounds whatsoever to have DF'd Bill Bowan, Barbara Anderson and her husband, or any of the countless ones who were molested by ones in the congregation and who went to the police. "Causing divisions in the congregation" was not mentioned in the list of "offenses" and even if it were, these people are to be treated "as a tax collector" or "a person of the nations".
Less the Governing Body forget, Jesus ATE with the tax collectors and certainly never shunned a "person of the nations". While these classes of people were not everyone's favorite person, Jesus himself NEVER taught his followers to ignore someone, so the Governing Body is actually going directly against what Jesus taught.
What idiots they truly are............