Greetings to all:
I just read Heff's "Hi" thread and thought "thank god I was raised Catholic" and then I found this. Needless to say I cannot resist correcting a few things. Keep in mind I am not Catholic or Christian now and consider the bible to be very un-god-like so I am not rushing to the defense of the RCC, just adding my two cents.
Here we go:
:Then
one day I began to put some ideas together and came up with a number
of parallels between the Roman Catholic Chruch and the WTBTS. Here
they are, let me know what you think.
I think you are right but a little mis-informed, but considering you were a JW, this is understandable. There are many parallels but you missed the mark a bit.
:The Catholic Church claims to be the only true church. They use the
term `the Mother Church` .
This claim has faded over the past few decades, they are going with more of a We-were-the-first spin these days (quick to cite the "Upon this rock..." nonsense).
:The RCC has a hierarchal arrangement with priests being the local conduit of TRUTH from on
high.Much like the elder arrangement.
Except priests tend to be educated.
:The RCC uses fear tactics to
encourage people to stay in the org. In both religions non-believers
get a second chance in the after-life, while apostates are damned.
The RCC uses the fear that the bible does to keep people believing. All bible based religions use fear. I will say this though, in my 30 some years of being Catholic, I never heard a word against other religions or anyone who had once been Catholic. Ever. And I went to Catholic school even. I never feared being excommunicated or shunned and never heard of any such thing happening for centuries. The seemingly kinder, gentler RCC is even saying outrageous things like "you can be saved and not be Catholic".
:Both religions have an additional avenue for truth other than the
Bible alone.And both discourage (if not forbid) learning the Bible
on your own,lest you come to a different conclusion than `Mother`.
In Catholicism the "additional avenue for truth" is called "tradition" and most of them are based on writings that are considered to have some merit but didn't make the cut in the final draft of the bible. As to reading the bible, two views. For centuries the RCC wasn't too hot for the "unwashed" to get their hands on the bible, true. Now that I know what's in it I think it was very wise of them to try to prevent that. Now however the RCC strongly encourages its members to read and learn the bible. Unlike in the KH the words, "read your bible" aren't followed up with additional instruction like "along with your WT".
:Both religions rely heavily on visual aids. With the RCC it`s statuary
in the church and robes whereas with the WTS it`s drawings and pictures in their publications. Both include visual representations
of God (Jehovah).Check out the Revelation book and see how many drawings there are of Jehovah all gold and sitting on a throne.I
thought the 10 commandments forbade ANY image of God...!
One thing to keep in mind is the age of the RCC. While even the newer churches include statues and various artwork this sort of thing began when the faithful were generally illiterate. This fabulous artwork served a two-fold purpose. One was to attest to the piety of the sponsor/builder of a magnificent house of god (and hopefully help god to overlook a few of their imperfections/transgressions). The other was to provide bible stories to the illiterate.
The pictures in the WT's Revelation book are meant to scare the hell out of you so you will schlepp their wretched mags from door to door the rest of your days. Period.
:Both religions boast of a unified world-wide organization. Both feature
several extra-biblical prohibitions based on the orgs. interpretation.
With the RCC it includes contraception and marriage of priests as well
as some dietary restrictions.
See what I don't understand is how come people can read Paul's rantings about abstinence and not comprehend the RCC's spin on celebacy for the priests. Go forth and multiply sounds like an order to reproduce to me so there's the birth control issue and the only dietary restrictions I know of is the no-meat on fridays during lent rule, but that's voluntary and has been considered such for ages.
The funny thing here is that I actually agree with you that there are some nasty similarities between the WT and the RCC. I am of the view however that the WT more closely resembles the RCC of centuries ago than the one of today.
One more point I would very much like to make is that most here have been JWs therefore many of you know what you do of the RCC from the WT. Sure there is plenty of info out there on the RCC and much of it's activities are in the news and common knowledge. But one must put aside learned prejudices in order to make objective evaluations.
Julie, who has made the objective evaluation that it is all superstitious nonsense