The link is here: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,534960,00.html
Fox News is the Bush legacy.
foxnews today - {another bullcrap story} siberia's lake baikal the worlds deepest lake.....military divers chased "a group of humanoid creatures dressed in silver suites".....3 humans died during the chase.
six objects followed a sub in the pacific...when the sub surfaced so did the objects, which then left the water and flew away.. anyone see the movie "the abyss"........drugs are bad!
mermaids anyone?.
The link is here: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,534960,00.html
Fox News is the Bush legacy.
russian scientist claims a ufo saved earth by smashing into a meteor which blew up in tunguska 1908 knocking down miles of trees in the explosion????
he claims to have found a "control panel" in a slab of rock, and meterial that "can only be found in space" duuuuur!
i think ufo's are just another fantasy religion that people rely on..
It only goes to show the morons demographics targetted by Fox news.
has anyone seen this documentary?
do you think al qaeda was just made up or does it really exist?
sammieswife.. top ranking cia operatives admit al-qaeda is a complete fabricationby mr. charrington on january 7, 2008. bbcs killer documentary called the power of nightmares.
BS! There are no radical religious groups anywhere in the world.
what's with the damn media panic?
swine flu is gonna wipe out the world!.....like the witnesses i'm tired of these lies, sars and bird flu were not that huge....a year ago a scientist said birdflu would be the next "spanish influenza" killing millions......hello, i'm still here wearing a gas mask!.
lets all panic the friggin world so they forget the economy!!!!!!
I heard from a reliable source on the internets that the Swine Flu has been linked to greatly increased chemtrail activity over Mexico City. Of course "mainstream" media won't report this fact.
I also got from an extremely reliable source on the internet that:
President Clinton killed 300 people to cover up is affair with Monica Lewinski.
President Truman kidnapped the aliens from Rosswell.
President Roosevelt orchestrated Pearl Harbor.
Elvis shot JFK.
The Moon is made up of cheese.
what's with the damn media panic?
swine flu is gonna wipe out the world!.....like the witnesses i'm tired of these lies, sars and bird flu were not that huge....a year ago a scientist said birdflu would be the next "spanish influenza" killing millions......hello, i'm still here wearing a gas mask!.
lets all panic the friggin world so they forget the economy!!!!!!
Witness 007, the modern flu (and SARS) epidemics have been managed thanks to the asertive actions taken by world governments. The fact that the latest epidemics have not killed 5000,000 people -as it happened before- is because of scientific advances and proactive measures.
I feel sorry for you that see a coverup even on the sunrise.
don't panic!!!!!!!!!
7 died in mexico and 1 in america.....but hang on, one mexican infant died visiting america from mexico so technically 8 mexicans have died so far.
who is doing a great job being careful.
Thank you, but I rather get advice from the World Health Organization.
i got this video and thought i would ask you guys what you think.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4w9wgxh2ato.
.
Unfortunately, there are hundreds of other viruses more suitable for a bioweapon.
I feel sorry for those who see coverups on even the sunrise.
this is the first part of my visit from my brother who is an elder and the p.o.
of my old congregation.. billed as a shepherding visit for our benefit , it eventually results in both of these elders testifying against me in a judicial committee.. the webpage is called deathorobedience.blogspot.com.
you can hear all the audio from the first visit also.. the link to the audio is below.. http://media.libsyn.com/media/tartanpodcast/doro_5.mp3.
i started this as a new thread because the orignal was getting rather long and distant from the op.
mad dog and i were circulating what, i maintain (or admit) are some fairly specific grounds for starting the discussion.. he was defending a version of (as i understand it): it is unfounded or irrational to accept the theory of evolution as probably true because either the evidence is insufficient compared to what should be observed according to the theory or the evidence observed, while corresponding to the theory, nevertheless is based on unfounded or irrational assumptions.. he is not saying, as i understand it, the following: there exists some evidence which either falsifies the necessary conditions or some other theory which better fits the data.. i was defending and will defend: it is rational to accept the theory of evolution as probably true because the evidence closely corresponds to and is sufficient compared to what should be observed according to the theory and (if we ever get there) it is irrational to reject or postpone judgement of the theory on these grounds.. i'll certainly leave the last half for now, and cut right to the chase in as terse a way possible to allow a likewise pointed rebuttal.. if the theory of evolution were true.... 1. the necessary condition of variation within a population of organisms should be observed.. 2. the necessary condition of a means of heredity should be observed.. 3. the necessary condition of mechanisms os selection should be observed to act on, within and between populations of organisms.. (these conditions, if proven, satisfy that the theory is at least possibly true, but does not constitute grounds to determine rational belief or disbelief in common descent.).
4. there should be evidence observable in the present and derivable through repeatable analytic means therefrom that life has existed on earth for a long time with respect to the life span of any known organism.. 5. any evidence for the existance of past life forms which is observable in the present should by comparative anatomy, geographical location, computational dating and other methods correspond to the prediction of the descent of species from common ancestors.. 6. the current biogeographical distribution of species alive today should be observed to correspond to the theory of common descent and also fit the evidence in (5).. 7. given genetics, the observable evidence in (6, some of 5, some of 1-3) should be verified to match any corresponding prediction derived from the theory.. (these observations, a posteriori, would constitute strong evidence for the conclusion that probably, evolution is true and may or may not constitute logical grounds for rational belief depending on exactly how an opposing position is developed.
Here is a little grounding material to consider before you write again:
Evolution does NOT aim to unveil the origin of life.
Evolution studies the change in the genetic material of a population of organisms from one generation to the next. It is not a "theory" but a biochemical fact.
hey gang, i got a link from a buddy of mine on how cancer can be fought off with baking soda.
i read the article and while i can't prove or disprove the claims, it seems like some reasonable information and it sure can't hurt to try it.
thought i'd share it with you all.. http://www.bamboo-delight.com/download/cure_cancer_with_baking_soda.htm.
Bullshit! There a re many kinds of cancer each one with very different molecular precursors and metabolism.