I believe that people such as TonusOH and others have responded quite well, in accordance with what I was trying to point out. My thought was, If spontaneous abortions, or, miscarriages, are nature's way of terminating or ending a pregnancy---and they happen more often than we might think--- then why do some people have an objection when some---not all---female human beings, choose to have an abortive procedure, when they come to the realization that they are pregnant? Let me clarify something: I might have mentioned this in a previous response, but I'll repeat it here: I have absolutely no "skin in the game" in this issue. I have never, ever wanted to perpetuate the human race by contributing to the production of " cranking out babies" onto the face of Planet Earth. And, I have not done so. But, let me be clear on this: I am of the "pro-choice" mindset. That's right---pro-choice. I firmly believe that an adult female, when she comes to the realization that she is pregnant, should have the right to choose how to proceed with the pregnancy, whether to continue with it, let the fetus develop for 9 months and give birth to a baby at that point----or, to terminate the pregnancy at a reasonable, feasible time. The choice should be left up to the female who is pregnant. Not some governmental entity...not some religious entity. So, hey, if the individual states in the United States are now going to decide whether to have abortion legal or illegal in their own respective states, then so be it. Let's see what happens in 10, 15, or 20 years.
Posts by titch
-
173Roe vs Wade Overturned by US Supreme Court!
by Simon ini know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
-
-
-
21
I never had a happy birthday this year 5/7
by smiddy3 inmy wife had a hip replacement on june the 17th and while the op itself was apparently succesful ,she has had a reaction to the anesthetic ?
and has suffered delirium and is still in hospital with no apparent improvement.. its been very distressing for me to say the least.
sorry if i sound a bit morbid but i just had to share,.
-
-
titch
Smiddy3: Correct me if I am wrong on this, But, didn't you have hip replacement surgery sometime last year? I think that you and I had a conversation about our own surgeries, and I must say, that I did not have any reaction to the anesthesia, and you didn't also. So, I don't know, if this is a common happening, or if just happens to a certain percentage of surgery recipients. I do hope that the effects will go away very soon. Best Regards,
Titch.
-
173
Roe vs Wade Overturned by US Supreme Court!
by Simon ini know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
-
-
titch
Responding to LoveUni: By my quoting the writing of Sam Harris, what I was trying to point out is that, maybe, just maybe a miscarriage is nature's way of ending...terminating...aborting...a pregnancy? Could be, could be. And, I wish that people would stop using that terminology "unborn babies." A fetus is not an unborn "baby." A fetus is just that...a fetus. It is a pre-birth fetus. It is not a full-fledged, viable human being. During the 9-month period inside the womb of my mother, I was just that, a pre-birth fetus. And, for the first few weeks of my mom's pregnancy, I was merely a "clump of cells." A globule of cells. I didn't have any conscious thoughts, any ideas, any concepts. I was not a "cute pre-born baby." A fetus. That's all.
Titch.
-
9
Ex-Elder Joe Talks to JW's "Babies enemies of God"
by Newly Enlightened inhttps://youtu.be/rwp_pii9axg.
-
-
titch
Interesting that when he mentioned that he HAD been a JW for 49 years, the two female compatriots left the area. I suppose that as soon as he said that, they automatically thought, "Uh oh, APOSTATE! APOSTATE! APOSTATE! We can't stay here and listen to this guy. We must leave, or else we'll be contaminated." Oh, well. '
Titch.
-
23
OH...NO! Watchtower Has A New Rule Related To Dress And Grooming
by JW GoneBad inthe new head-of-the-house max has a problem with how his new stepdaughter (olivia) looks and dresses.. on the friday afternoon part 2 convention video @ 18:10 max 1st brings it up with olivia while in the kitchen!
then fast forward to 26:50 thru 27:65 max bellyaches to new wife (olivia's mother) & it's handled!
message to all rank & file jws....no more fashion torn jeans & beach sandles: :) :) :).
-
-
titch
Folks: WEll, if I were still a JW, I would have no problem with beach sandals, worn in an appropriate setting. But, I've seen some people---mostly young persons---both male and female---wearing that new "fashion" of ripped jeans. And, the thought that goes through my mind is "Come on people, show a little class, please!" But, that's just my "take" on the trend in clothing. Best Regards, Everyone.
Titch.
-
7
UK Contaminated Blood Scandal
by Simon inup to 30,000 people contracted hiv and hepatitis c in the 1970s and 80s after being given blood treatments or transfusions on the nhs.. thousands have since died.. it just goes to show there is no such thing as a sure thing.. the wts may be wrong about their blood doctrine, and their bible interpretation to justify it, and how they enforced the rules about it, but ultimately may be correct in claiming that "bloodless surgery" was a safer option medically.. canada also had a contaminated blood scandal, where 30,000 were infected with hepatitis c and hiv.. in other news, paying for blood from high-risk donors is a bad idea.
who knew?
well apparently the people behind the schemes did, and that's why they covered it up.. https://www.bbc.com/news/health-61929986.
-
-
titch
Well, yes, of course, Mr. Simon, there is never a thing such as a "sure thing." But, here is something to think about: Being an Amateur Radio Operator, over the years, I would buy magazines that are "geared" to Amateur Radio. And, one such magazine is "73 Amateur Radio Today." The Publisher of that magazine was Mr. Wayne Green, who had the call sign of W2NSD. And, each month, he would write a column called "Never Say Die." In the March 2001 issue of that magazine, he had a sub-topic titled "Transfusions."
Now, to the best of my knowledge, Mr. Green was never a Jehovah's Witness while he was alive. But, in that column, he wrote this: "Doctors are doing millions of blood transfusions every year, and I'll bet you're completely convinced that this is a good, life-saving procedure. My advice? Do everything you can to avoid one!
"I used to work in an office on 43rd Street in Manhattan. On the floor below our publishing offices was a blood bank, so I got a good look at their clientele over the five years I worked there---it was mostly homeless winos, getting enough money for another bottle of the cheapest wine they could find.
"As I've mentioned , every cell in your body, and that includes every cell in your blood, is in constant contact with every other cell, even when separated from you by thousands of miles. When you get a transfusion of someone else's blood, you're getting a part of them integrated into your mind/body system, and not just your body. You'll also get a good collection of any poisons they were carrying around, such as alcohol, nicotine, caffeine, and any other drugs, viruses, microbes, parasites, fungi or yeasts in their blood. And maybe some toxic metals, too.
"If you think I'm exaggerating, you haven't bothered to read The Secret Life of Your Cells yet. I've reviewed it in my editorial, and in my Secret Guide to Wisdom. Even though the new blood is the same type as yours, it is from another person and your immune system will get busy eliminating the invader. That's just what you need at a time when you need all of the strength your immune system can muster to help you recover from whatever caused the doctors to give you the transfusion.
" If you have made any effort to develop your psychic ability, once you've had a transfusion you'll be able to pick up many of the thoughts and feelings of the person from whom you've received the blood. One woman wrote a book about an organ transplant where she was able to sense the name of the donor and feel his feelings. And, thousands of people have reported weird things resulting from blood transfusions. A recent lab test with cells from an athlete's heart beat exactly in pace with his heart as he walked and ran, even though he was miles away."
So, those are the thoughts/words from Wayne Green, W2NSD, the Publisher of 73 Amateur Radio Today, who, as I mentioned, was NOT a Witness, as far as I know. Just something to think about.---Best Regards....
Titch.
-
173
Roe vs Wade Overturned by US Supreme Court!
by Simon ini know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
-
-
titch
Here's something to consider: I read this in a book entitled "Letter to a Christian Nation", written by Sam Harris. In that book, he made this observation: "Of course, the Church's position on abortion takes no more notice of the details of biology than it does of the reality of human suffering. It has been estimated that 50 percent of all human conceptions end in spontaneous abortion, usually without a woman even realizing that she was pregnant. In fact, 20 percent of all recognized pregnancies end in miscarriage. There is an obvious truth here that cries out for acknowledgment: if God exists, He is the most prolific abortionist of all." So, think about this: If it is true that 50 percent of all conceptions end in spontaneous abortion---or, a miscarriage---without the woman even realizing that she IS pregnant---then, who, or what---is responsible for that termination of the existence of a fetus? God? Allah? Yahweh? A supreme being? A deity? The Universe? Just "nature" taking its course? Who? What? Just wondering. Best Regards, Everyone.
Titch.
"
-
-
-
titch
Well, I HAVE watched most of the hearings on TV, and they have been very intriguing to THIS 68-year-old mind. The Select Committee has been investigating and interviewing people for almost a year, and now the time has come to reveal to the American public---and the world---what facts have been discovered. I DO NOT believe that the timing has been a way of deflecting people's attention away from the economy or any other current event.
To set the record straight, I did not vote for Joseph Biden. I feel that he should not be the President of the U.S. But, having stated that, I did not vote for Donald J. Trump, either. I honestly feel that he should NOT have been re-elected for another 4-year term as President. I voted for the two Candidates from the American Independent Party, even though I didn't know anything about them, or their stand on issues. (I am not registered as an Independent, I am registered to vote as a Democrat.) Oh, yes, it was probably throwing away my vote, but oh well. Best Regards, Everyone.
Titch.
-
35
Still here.
by Lee Marsh inthe last 2 1/2 years have been extremely stressful.
while the rest of the world was dealing with covid, i was also dealing with cancer.
in fact it seems none of my doctors knew about it.
-
-
titch
Lady Lee: I greatly admire and respect your tenacity and courage in life. Best Regards...Titch.
-
173
Roe vs Wade Overturned by US Supreme Court!
by Simon ini know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
-
-
titch
There is something that I've been wondering about for a long time. First of all, I have no "skin in the game" whatsoever. I have never had the experience of perpetuating the human race, by contributing to the procreation of any human beings. That is something that I NEVER had any desire to do, and I still do not have any desire to do. Having stated that, I am pro-choice.(I honestly believe that there are too many human bodies on the face of Planet Earth. )_
So, here's my question: If----and I do mean IF--- there is some god, some creator, some "supreme being" out there, who is opposed to terminating the existence of fetuses---notice that I didn't use the term "babies"---and who has the ability to see into the future as to the end result of things---then why, WHY, didn't he/she/it prevail upon the minds of the U.S. Supreme Court Justices, back in 1973, to make a different decision regarding the ruling on the right to privacy? Why did he/she/it wait over 49 years to influence the minds of U.S. Supreme Court Justices to overturn the ruling that was made in 1973? Can anyone clarify this matter for me? Best Regards, Everyone.
Titch.