Posts by Essan

164

My sister died in a head on collision last night

by Bumble Bee in

jw
friends

i still can't believe it.

she was here for the bbq, we had an awesome time, laughing, her telling stories from our childhoods.

i gave her a hug and told her i loved her before she left.

Essan

13

Recognizing Common Pitfalls of False Argumentation - By Ray Franz

by flipper in

jw
friends

there are honest ways of arguing- and dishonest ways of arguing.

in ray franz book " in search of christian freedom " on pg.

437 he quotes some points from " logic and contemporary rhetoric " by howard kahane of bernard baruch college regarding invalid methods used by people who pontificate on the basis of superior wisdom or superior authority.

Essan

If the Society stopped using those listed fallacies the magazines would be blank.

Here's a game we could play - match the various WT subjects with the fallacies they commonly use.

1. Straw man = Trinity (misrepresenting, then 'debunking' their misrepresentation)

2. Circular reasoning = Secondary fulfillment of prophesy (not establishing that secondary fulfillment is Scriptural first)

3. False analogy = Blood policy (claim that transfusing is like eating, abstain from alcohol same as abstain from blood etc.)

4. False Dilemma = 'God's Organization', Christendom vs JW's, also circular because not proven God actually has an 'Organization' before we must choose.

5. Red Herring = Supposed Pagan Origins of things they want to demonize.

6. Ad Hominem = Supposed bad hearts and insincerity condemns Christendom, but good hearts, pure motive excuses JW's, often of same crimes.

7. Provincialism = JW's vs The World, JW religion is "The Truth". JW religion defines 'truth', truth does not define JW religion.

I'm sure others can identify more.

9

How WT Apologists at JWN inherently break forum rules. :)

by Essan in

i noticed the posting guidelines the other day as i was replying to djeggnog, one of our relentless wt apologists (although he's very unapologetic about it :) and i noticed one rule in particular that got me thinking.. seeing as such jw's are representatives of an organization that falsely claims to solely "represent" a pretty important person - god - and they frequently make the claim here that the org.

represents god on earth and that it's teachings are god's teachings - a claim they have been completely unable to substantiate - then i'm fairly sure they must be in breach of rule 7:.

"impersonating or falsely claiming to represent a person or organization".. so, if ever one was looking for a technicality on which to 'disfellowship' any particularly unpleasant and deceptive society worshipping spammers, then maybe posting guideline 7 might be the way to go.

Essan

Yes, but tell the truth Sab, if - as is quite likely - she turns around in six months time and says "That's it, I've changed my mind. You were right. This can't be God's Org." you'd still give her a big cyber-hug. LOL.

9

How WT Apologists at JWN inherently break forum rules. :)

by Essan in

i noticed the posting guidelines the other day as i was replying to djeggnog, one of our relentless wt apologists (although he's very unapologetic about it :) and i noticed one rule in particular that got me thinking.. seeing as such jw's are representatives of an organization that falsely claims to solely "represent" a pretty important person - god - and they frequently make the claim here that the org.

represents god on earth and that it's teachings are god's teachings - a claim they have been completely unable to substantiate - then i'm fairly sure they must be in breach of rule 7:.

"impersonating or falsely claiming to represent a person or organization".. so, if ever one was looking for a technicality on which to 'disfellowship' any particularly unpleasant and deceptive society worshipping spammers, then maybe posting guideline 7 might be the way to go.

Essan

Calm down, nobody is suggesting you should be disfellowshipped from the JW's LOL. I was just saying that if apologists and JW spammers get to be too much of a pain in rear then rule 7 may come to the rescue. (and note which forum you are in).

But BTW, you can be DF'd for legal online activities. The Society has, for instance, DF'd many people for having websites or making online comments critical of WT doctrine or policy. That's legal, the WT just doesn't allow free speech or criticism. But, don't worry, you can enjoy all of the free speech and Christian Freedom that Jesus wants you to have here at JWN, even if you can't get it at the Hall.

31

Watchtower's Jesus = Michael doctrine

by Ding in

i've never really understood the watchtower's teaching on jesus being michael.

here is what i understand they teach:.

1. jehovah's first creation was the archangel michael.. 2. jesus was nothing more than a perfect man, not michael the archangel in human form.. 3. rather, when jesus was conceived in mary, michael went out of existence and his impersonal life force was put into jesus (analogous to sharing the same pacemaker).. 4. when jesus died, his impersonal life force went back into a recreated archangel michael.. .

Essan

"The Watchtower Society has it all effed up."

Truism. That simple phrase sums up and renders thousands of posts at JWN redundant.

The Watchtower Society does indeed have it all effed up.

I want that on a t-Shirt.

9

How WT Apologists at JWN inherently break forum rules. :)

by Essan in

i noticed the posting guidelines the other day as i was replying to djeggnog, one of our relentless wt apologists (although he's very unapologetic about it :) and i noticed one rule in particular that got me thinking.. seeing as such jw's are representatives of an organization that falsely claims to solely "represent" a pretty important person - god - and they frequently make the claim here that the org.

represents god on earth and that it's teachings are god's teachings - a claim they have been completely unable to substantiate - then i'm fairly sure they must be in breach of rule 7:.

"impersonating or falsely claiming to represent a person or organization".. so, if ever one was looking for a technicality on which to 'disfellowship' any particularly unpleasant and deceptive society worshipping spammers, then maybe posting guideline 7 might be the way to go.

Essan

Yeah, that's why I put this in the humour section. It's tongue in cheek. :)

And you're right, we should extend the Christian freedom to them that their own religion will not allow them, or us.

269

Have your JW Relatives Explained about Generation/Overlap Change to You ?

by flipper in

jw
friends

after reading on the way out's thread about his mom explaining the generation overlap to him it kicked this idea into my head to make this thread .

i thought it would be helpful to see if anybody here has had jw relatives or friends try to explain this " generation overlap " theory to you as a faded or inactive witness and what happened in the conversations.

so please feel free to post your experiences.

Essan

Oh I realize that flipper, but I think it would be a good exercise in Christian humility for Djeggnog to remove his teachers hat for a moment and to acknowledge that he made a fairly major false claim about the history of a central doctrine of his own Organization.

He can either acknowledge it, try to keep ignoring the issue as I keep reminding him of it, or stay away.

My hope is that he is now away doing the research about the history of the Society's teachings that he should have done before presuming to teach others about it. Who knows, maybe discovering the error of his belief that Russell taught that 1914 was the year that marked the beginning of Jesus 'invisible presence' will be the straw that broke the camels back? After all, he held this false belief because the Society had lied to him about their history.

You would hope that a sincere Christian would find such current lies by the Society about their past to to be totally unacceptable, even if they were to make excuses for the Society's original false teachings regarding 1874.

9

How WT Apologists at JWN inherently break forum rules. :)

by Essan in

i noticed the posting guidelines the other day as i was replying to djeggnog, one of our relentless wt apologists (although he's very unapologetic about it :) and i noticed one rule in particular that got me thinking.. seeing as such jw's are representatives of an organization that falsely claims to solely "represent" a pretty important person - god - and they frequently make the claim here that the org.

represents god on earth and that it's teachings are god's teachings - a claim they have been completely unable to substantiate - then i'm fairly sure they must be in breach of rule 7:.

"impersonating or falsely claiming to represent a person or organization".. so, if ever one was looking for a technicality on which to 'disfellowship' any particularly unpleasant and deceptive society worshipping spammers, then maybe posting guideline 7 might be the way to go.

Essan

I noticed the posting guidelines the other day as I was replying to DjEggnog, one of our relentless WT apologists (although he's very unapologetic about it :) and I noticed one rule in particular that got me thinking.

Seeing as such JW's are representatives of an Organization that falsely claims to solely "represent" a pretty important person - God - and they frequently make the claim here that the Org. represents God on earth and that it's teachings are God's teachings - a claim they have been completely unable to substantiate - then I'm fairly sure they must be in breach of rule 7:

"Impersonating or falsely claiming to represent a person or organization".

So, if ever one was looking for a technicality on which to 'disfellowship' any particularly unpleasant and deceptive Society worshipping spammers, then maybe posting guideline 7 might be the way to go. :)

(I personally think that many of them could technically also be caught under rule 8. "Posting in a language other than English", seeing as Watchtowerese makes absolutely no sense, but I can see that one would be a stretch. Lol)

31

Watchtower's Jesus = Michael doctrine

by Ding in

i've never really understood the watchtower's teaching on jesus being michael.

here is what i understand they teach:.

1. jehovah's first creation was the archangel michael.. 2. jesus was nothing more than a perfect man, not michael the archangel in human form.. 3. rather, when jesus was conceived in mary, michael went out of existence and his impersonal life force was put into jesus (analogous to sharing the same pacemaker).. 4. when jesus died, his impersonal life force went back into a recreated archangel michael.. .

Essan

"I've never really understood the Watchtower's teaching on Jesus being Michael"

Ah, well there is an excellent reason for that! It's because the teaching is baseless nonsense. It's poppycock.

Twaddle.

Bunkum.

Bull.

Congratulations on being able to spot it. Hopefully it didn't take you over three decades as a JW before you spotted it, as it did me. :)

19

These words really made me mad!!!

by Sour Grapes in

a couple of months ago the brother giving a talk was bragging about all of the good work.

that the wtbts does thru their missionaries.

he said that all that the christendom's missionaries.

Essan

JW's as a culture have no real love. Some few individual JW's have Christian love, but this is despite being JW's rather than because of it, and it's a struggle to hold onto that love in the cold and judgmental atmosphere of of Org.