Posts by rawe

65

2014 Event

by enigma1863 in

jw
friends

i know its a year away but i wanted to inquire about the hundred year anniversary of 1914. it would be amazing to have a world wide event reguarding all exjws.

i am nowhere near capable of putting this together but i'd like to propose the largest assembly of exjws ever on october 1st 2014. can it be done?

am i the first to bring this up?

rawe

Hi Everyone,

I'll post more details as the time gets closer. For the moment I have picked a time & place for the 2014 Shun Run...

Saturday, April 12, 2014, 10:00am at Papago Park, Tempe, AZ

This will be our 3rd run of this event. In 2012, nine came out and 2013 we had 20, so hopefully we'll have even more in 2014. We don't really "run", but we do walk a small hike through the tails of Papago Park. The sub-title I've chosen for this year is "Show Courage, Don't Shun." Around January I'll write my letter to SDB:SSY, the otherwised anonymous JW author at HQs who wrote me, to ask him once again, how one can end their membership in the organization without facing reprisals for doing so. So far, he has not written back an answer, since I first asked in 2010, but I'll keep asking (Matthew 7:7).

If you're in the Phoenix area or can make it out, we would love to have you join us!

Cheers,

-Randy

35

who has actually read the entire Bible?

by losingit in

no matter how many times i've tried, i just couldn't get through the whole thing.

you know, there were always those reminders to read the bible, have a personal study, go out in service, and.... the other two of the five things we were supposed to do i already forgot.

so, i constantly felt guilty that i just had no interest.

rawe

Hi losingit,

"End of Mysteries-- you have me curious. Id like to read the Bible in a scholarly way. I dont want to read it as a way to confirm or deny my faith in God."

I have read a couple interesting books by scholars about the Bible. Misquoting Jesus by Bart Ehrman and Who Wrote The Bible by Richard Friedman. Both books made me think much more about the material I was reading. It also made me think of time elements, just like one can easily quote a news source, but one cannot predict a future headline. These things can give you clues about who is writing and what is their concern. Having a goal to your reading, will make it more enjoyable. Nonetheless the material is from an ancient source and the reading can get tedious.

As soon as someone points out even the most simple thing, like Genesis 1:1 to 2:3 calls refers to God as 'God' (Elohim) and at 2:4 there is a switch to calling God, 'Jehovah', the reading does become more fun. Even contemporary issues like same-sex marriage are interesting to consider when looking more deeply at the actual text people sometimes quote.

Lev 20:12 condemns man with daughter-in-law sex, assigning it a death sentence.

Lev 20:13 condemns man with man sex, assigning it a death sentence.

So, why isn't woman with son-in-law sex directly condemned?

So, why isn't woman with woman sex condemend?

This lack of symmetry seems odd, but very well might be hinting at underlying concerns of the author. I added "directly" in my first question, because Lev 20:14 condems man with woman and her mother sex, assigning death by fire.

Cheers,

-Randy

35

who has actually read the entire Bible?

by losingit in

no matter how many times i've tried, i just couldn't get through the whole thing.

you know, there were always those reminders to read the bible, have a personal study, go out in service, and.... the other two of the five things we were supposed to do i already forgot.

so, i constantly felt guilty that i just had no interest.

rawe

Hi Everyone,

I've read the NWT cover-to-cover twice. Once as personal project and the second time as part of our family Bible reading. We have now started from Genesis again, but this time using The Brick Bible.

Cheers,

-Randy

93

When Was The Last Time You Set Foot In a Kingdom Hall?

by minimus in

jw
friends

weeks?

months?

years??

rawe

Hi Everyone,

Memorial 2013.

Cheers,

-Randy

4

Truth Be Told - Phoenix - 9/19

by rawe in

jw
friends

the truth be told film is coming to phoenix.

hope to see you there :-).

http://www.tugg.com/events/5361.

rawe

Hi Everyone,

Good news! 51 tickets have been sold so the event is now confirmed. There are still 61 spots available for any that have not yet bought a ticket ($12 each).

Cheers,

-Randy

16

TRUTH BE TOLD - new film on JWs previewing tomorrow night (Thursday) at Laemmle's in Los Angeles!

by Dogpatch in

jw
friends

sept. 12th (tomorrow night) in los angeles right by the freeway - 405 and santa monica blvd.. i'll be there!.

well the link is also here:.

gregorio smith is an independent filmmaker and writer.

rawe

Hi Randall,

This film is also coming to Phoenix, where I live.

http://www.tugg.com/events/5361

So far they've sold 34 tickets. They need to sell another 15 in the next 18 hours for the event to go forward. I hope it does, and am looking forward to seeing it.

Regards,

-Randy

ps. I have visited your FreeMinds website on and off over several years. Thank you for all your hard work!

76

Thoughts on Jesus' Resurrection

by Perry in

i think that in our various discussions about life after the wt, we many times forget about the cornerstone of christian life - the resurrection.

the implications of the existence a man who holds the power of life and death is manifold.

it makes discussions about the existence of god obsolete.. for all of scientists' accomplishments they have never been able to make even one amobea come alive from non-life.

rawe

Hi mP,

Just dropping by to say thanks -- I'm reading through your latest post.

I've been thinking about actually taking up your challenge directly. Although it would take some time to read all of the books said to be written by Paul. But I am interested in this in any regards, esp how often different phrases are used like "God", "Lord", "Jesus", etc, then of course how often Paul make some historical, even in passing, reference to Jesus.

Cheers,

-Randy

4

Truth Be Told - Phoenix - 9/19

by rawe in

jw
friends

the truth be told film is coming to phoenix.

hope to see you there :-).

http://www.tugg.com/events/5361.

rawe

Hi Everyone,

When I posted this note they had sold 12 tickets, I now see they're up to 25. They have 24 more to go for the event to happen. I'm now hoping it will happen just to see that many Ex-JWs in one place!

Cheers,

-Randy

76

Thoughts on Jesus' Resurrection

by Perry in

i think that in our various discussions about life after the wt, we many times forget about the cornerstone of christian life - the resurrection.

the implications of the existence a man who holds the power of life and death is manifold.

it makes discussions about the existence of god obsolete.. for all of scientists' accomplishments they have never been able to make even one amobea come alive from non-life.

rawe

Hi mP,

How exactly does that make my assertion wrong ? The gospels talk about Jesus does that make them *wrong* for the same reason because they talk about mundane and grander things ?

(disclaimer: In case someone sees just single posts of mine, you should know I an atheist and am not arguing for the idea Jesus was God, rather just exploring what reasonable conclusions can we reach from NT material).

I probably wouldn't say Paul's comment philosophy makes your assertion wrong. I would say we don't have enough information to make strong right vs wrong declarations. I went back a few posts to grab what you said...

Even Paul knows nothing about Jesus the man. scan thru all his writings and write down the facts you learn about jesus. stop when you get to 5. You wont learn about his family, where he went, what miracles he did, when he lived, who his apostles were and so on.

First, I think that is a great challenge for any Christian to under take. When I ran across this in the Brian Flemming film it really struck my how obvious things can be in the Bible, but unless you're doing critical analysis you'll miss it. The other alternative is to have someone point this out to you. Now of course Flemming asserts Paul's lack of commentary is part of the proof the historical Jesus did not exist. Your assertion is more mild, just that Paul knows nothing about Jesus. And my assertion is even more mild, that all we can say is if Paul did know specific details of the life of the historical Jesus he didn't report on them.

To use your George Washington example, if you referenced GW with nearly every post to point out what an important man he was to your philosophy, should we find it odd, that you refrain from citing any specific about the life of GW? Maybe. But I'm not sure that could be used as proof that you didn't really know any about GW.

In regards to the gospels, my feelings are they are different than Paul's writings for two reasons. The obvious is different authors have different styles. But I think the biggest difference is in purpose -- the intent of the gospels (esp the synoptic ones) was the capture a life-story of Jesus. Likely the ones selected for the Bible canon were the most popular and most trusted of their day. One of the challenges a friend of mine who was in the process of leaving the faith, while I was still strongly in, gave me was to reconcile the resurrection accounts. I thought no problem, pulled out the Greatest Man book and The Bible and started. Alas, I don't think it can be done. The accounts have serious and not so easy to dismiss contraditions.

Cheers,

-Randy

76

Thoughts on Jesus' Resurrection

by Perry in

i think that in our various discussions about life after the wt, we many times forget about the cornerstone of christian life - the resurrection.

the implications of the existence a man who holds the power of life and death is manifold.

it makes discussions about the existence of god obsolete.. for all of scientists' accomplishments they have never been able to make even one amobea come alive from non-life.

rawe

Hi mP,

"The argument that P didn't mention facts about J makes no sense. He often gives other mundane facts that we can assume they already knew. He repeats personal details about himself which they already knew. The easier to believe or ponder fact is that P didn't know our J. If you read the text J exists on a different spiritual plane. P's Judaism is different from that of the apostles."

Alas, we can't go back in time and interview Paul or Jesus. Probably the best we can do is get a sense or feeling about what Paul knew about Jesus and what he didn't based on the material we have. As per the record in Acts, Paul, in fact did not know Jesus personally, so I would argue that favors the idea he wouldn't reflect on specific details from the historical life of Jesus.

Consider Paul's words a Colossians 2: " See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the elemental spiritual forces [ a ] of this world rather than on Christ. "

I think the mention of "philosophy" is key to understanding Paul. The Roman world of his day, was influenced by Greek philosophy. Paul even quotes from the Stoic Philosopher Aratus at Acts 17:28 " For we are also His offspring ." Paul viewed knowledge about the Christ as the answer to competing philosophy of his day. Also notice when Paul make these sort of arguments his stress on "Christ" rather than "Jesus."

Even many modern preachers of Christianity talk very little about the historical details of Jesus life.

In summary my argument is, given that Paul did not know Jesus personally and his style was to focus on philosophical aspects of belief, we should not expect him to comment on many historical details of Jesus life. Even so, there is at least one case of historical reflection. 1 Corinthians 11:23-26, reflects on the last supper event.

Cheers,

-Randy