@Sea Breeze
No one has a problem with eternal punishment. The problem is with eternal conscious punishment or eternal punishing. The wages of sin is death, not torment.
It is not strange that you can only present one verse in the OT to support eternal punishing and yet the word torment is not included.
On top of that, the word contempt is not what the unrighteous are described as experiencing. It is the righteous who eternally view the wicked with contempt.
Albert Barnes writes
"The word "contempt" (דראון derâ'ôn) means, properly, a repulse; and then aversion, abhorrence. The meaning here is aversion or abhorrence - the feeling with which we turn away from what is loathsome, disgusting, or hateful. Then it denotes the state of mind with which we contemplate the vile and the abandoned; and in this respect expresses the emotion with which the wicked will be viewed on the final trial. The word everlasting completes the image, meaning that this feeling of loathing and abhorrence would continue forever. In a subordinate sense this language might be used to denote the feelings with which cowards, ingrates, and apostates are regarded on earth; but it cannot be doubted that it will receive its most perfect fulfillment in the future world - in that aversion with which the lost will be viewed by all holy beings in the world to come."
So where do you think the religious rulers in Jesus day got the idea that the wicked experience torment after death and eternal torment after final judgment?