Posts by MeanMrMustard

299

Who told the first lie?

by nicolaou in

this is a continuation of the discussion which sprang from an unrelated topic.. so according to genesis, who told the first lie?

god told eve that if she ate from the tree of knowledge she would die that very same day.

in response to that statement the devil told her she would not die.. eve ate from the tree and did not die.

MeanMrMustard

Lol. Maybe this is why he was given a wife. Brilliant, even better.

Notice, in that newly discovered ancient manuscript, immortalized on page 6 of this thread, that documents a discussion between Adam and God, that I definitely did not make up, you can get a sense of how futile it would be to attempt to steer a man that can't tell good from evil.

A man that has no knowledge of good and evil can't be given a reason "why" he should refrain, other than a direct threat to his own physical experience, just a general consequence in a cause/effect relationship.

Perhaps the "tree" lie was just another "white lie" told by God because there was no other way to explain it Adam. "You'll die if you eat from that tree" might have been the only way to get Adam to respond, much like "You'll go blind if you keep jerking it around the garden."

So he understood that God gave him instructions, and he followed them. He knew God was in charge. Adam understood he was subservient to God.

Adam was mentally capable...

He could understand facts told to him. And logic. But since he didn't understand good from evil, right from wrong, navigating a world of free will would be like navigating a world of color when all you can see is gray.

299

Who told the first lie?

by nicolaou in

this is a continuation of the discussion which sprang from an unrelated topic.. so according to genesis, who told the first lie?

god told eve that if she ate from the tree of knowledge she would die that very same day.

in response to that statement the devil told her she would not die.. eve ate from the tree and did not die.

MeanMrMustard

A little known fact : based on other ancient manuscripts recently found, there was another recorded exchange between God and Adam sometime before the "tree" talk. It may shed light on the nature of the "lie" told here.

God: Hello Adam.

Adam: Hello. Beautiful day. Thanks for that.

God: No worries. You're welcome. But I wanted to talk to you for a moment about something you keep doing.

Adam: Sure. What's that?

God: Well, I can't help but notice, along with all the angels, that you tend to spend your day masterbating around the garden.

Adam: Yes. For sure. It's great. A hearty thanks for that too.

God: Yes. But you really shouldn't so that so much.

Adam: I shouldn't? What do you mean.

God: Well, it's not right.

Adam: Oh, am doing it incorrectly? There is a better way? Well, what is it? I would love to hear the right way.

God: No, no. That's not what I mean. I mean it's not an appropriate thing to do. That's all the angels are talking about.

Adam: What do you mean by "appropriate"? If I can do it, why wouldn't I?

God: Because it is not good.

Adam: Oh, it's pretty good. Have you ever done it? Do you know what it's like?

God: No, of course I haven't.

Adam: Really? I just thought you might do it now again since I was made in your image. I figure you had a well developed part ... well, maybe you've been missing out. Let me show you how it's done. First you grab it like this...

God: I know how it's done! Stop it.

Adam: Oh so you know what it's like. You must know, you know everything, right?

God: No it's not like that. I don't have that type of knowledge. I don't know what it is like experientially to do .... At least not for the next 7000 years or so.

Adam: What's that supposed to mean?

God: Nothing. Look, that's all you seem to do. The act itself is unclean and wrong.

Adam: Well, I don't know what you mean by "wrong". You said I was doing it "right", and I wash up in the garden stream quite often.

God: I want you to stop it.

Adam: But why?

God: You have to trust me that it's not a good act.

Adam: That's kinda... hard... to believe. Get it? Eh? I mean you are saying it's wrong, but I'm doing it "right"... and it feels super great. So, I don't know what you mean. Are you mistaken? Look, I can show it's good. Let me give you a demonst.....

God: I'm not mistaken! It's not moral to do.

Adam: What does "not moral" mean?

God: It means that it's evil. The opposite of good.

Adam: I see. Like stubbing my toe? That hurt. It was not good. Was it evil to stub my toe?

God: No that was just an accident.

Adam: So accidents are good? Or are they evil?

God: Neither... they are more neutral than anything.

Adam: I don't think I understand.

God: *sigh*.. Look, just don't do it. If you do you'll go blind, ok?

Adam: Blind?! That would be horrible. I like seeing.

God: Right. So there you go. Just stop or you'll go blind.

Adam: Sure thing. I'm going to go rape that goat now. TTYL.

God: No... wait... ugggg

299

Who told the first lie?

by nicolaou in

this is a continuation of the discussion which sprang from an unrelated topic.. so according to genesis, who told the first lie?

god told eve that if she ate from the tree of knowledge she would die that very same day.

in response to that statement the devil told her she would not die.. eve ate from the tree and did not die.

MeanMrMustard

Hence, the simplicity of the command.

So? The ability to understand the words, and the meaning of the words, is different than understanding the moral implications of the command. Without the knowledge of "good" and "evil", there is NO concept of "should" and "should not".

It wasn't even about a single, isolated tree beckoning them. It was a garden. There were trees everywhere. All blending in and looking the same or similar perhaps.

I'm not sure why that matters.

If I'm understanding your question correctly, that mechanism was trust. Assuming that Adam and Eve were as ignorant as you propose, it would be trust.

If someone doesn't know good from evil, does that person even know the difference between "truth" and "lie"? A lie a false statement made with an intent to deceive. Adam may know the difference between "correct" and "incorrect". But to Adam or Eve, a statement that contradicts God's statement had no malice in it. To them, they have no way to treat it other than new, updated info... new light, if you will. "Oh, you mean God was mistaken?"

You might counter that they shouldn't have believed or trusted anything anyone else said. But upon what basis do they have the ability to make that judgement? The idea that they are being deceived is derived from the knowledge of good and evil. If they are to "trust" God, then they would "distrust" others. What reason would they have to "distrust" others, except for the possibility they may be deceived, and that's beyond their ability to discern of even "know" at that moment.

The scriptures tell us Adam deferred to God, knowing he was inferior to God, not equals. He knew that much...that God, by virtue of being 'superior' would know better.

Ok. What do you mean by "better"?

The scripture also reveals that they understood that death, whatever that was, was not a desired thing. They had enough capacity to put not following God's command as equaling death, as equaling not a desired thing.

I don't think you understand how disabled they were, if they didn't know right from wrong. I refer to my paragraphs above.

As for the ultimate price being justified. People of faith will always defer to God, always. People without faith, obviously never will.

I don't think so. If a mentally retarded child takes a candy bar from a store, do we dole out the death penalty?

299

Who told the first lie?

by nicolaou in

this is a continuation of the discussion which sprang from an unrelated topic.. so according to genesis, who told the first lie?

god told eve that if she ate from the tree of knowledge she would die that very same day.

in response to that statement the devil told her she would not die.. eve ate from the tree and did not die.

MeanMrMustard

Also, why is Satan a "master deceiver"? Seems like deceiving Adam and Eve would be like putting a bacon treat in front of a puppy...

299

Who told the first lie?

by nicolaou in

this is a continuation of the discussion which sprang from an unrelated topic.. so according to genesis, who told the first lie?

god told eve that if she ate from the tree of knowledge she would die that very same day.

in response to that statement the devil told her she would not die.. eve ate from the tree and did not die.

MeanMrMustard

It's an argument about internal consistency, it seems. For a moment, grant all the premises, suspend disbelief, and just read it as if it were a history book.

"The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil."

So, before eating the fruit, neither of them "knew", or "understood" good from evil. I think that it is safe to say that anyone that doesn't understand a distinction between "good" and "evil", doesn't know "right" from "wrong".

Assume God had many discussions with Adam about what to do, and what not to do. No matter what God said, Adam was incapable of understanding why he would refrain from any act at all.

For example, what's an "evil" act? What if someone were to violently torture and rape a baby? Seem pretty evil. Can you imagine being truthfully confused by the statement "you should not rape and torture a baby because it's wrong, its evil"?

Adam and Eve were basically psychopathic postmodernists.

In legal terms, Adam and Eve were not capable of having the mens rea to commit any "crime". They cant understand "crime" itself.

In short: By what mechanism did God expect Adam and Eve to do "the right thing"? And for what reason is the ultimate price appropriate or justified?

4

This Shocked Me

by Tahoe in

jw
friends

https://youtu.be/llpumfeknte?si=wmnw4asktjqx9thg.

MeanMrMustard

Why is it shocking?

Molesters will go where it's easy to molest.

73

Did God know adam and eve would sin?

by gavindlt in

to all those on this forum, i would love to know what your take on this vital question is..

MeanMrMustard

No, the problem I have is simply ... WHY.

Why did our loving heavenly Father not say to Able "it is a good idea to not go out with your brother today"?

Here is one logical reason: What if, because He has all knowledge, he knew the worlds in which he prevented the murder of Able also turn out worse - in one way or another. Suppose Able had a son, who had a son, who had a son who killed hundreds of people.

What if all possible worlds with free will have evil in them, but this world just happens to be the one with the least amount of evil?

Also, is it really true that we were supposed to be created free from hardship? I know that's the JW doctrine, but I don't think it's the Christian one. Why are we assuming humans were supposed to be created as God's pets?

What if Able was kept physically alive, and less suffering occurs over time, but less people are "saved" in the long run?

In short, if you believe in God, as a human, you aren't in a good epistemic position to ask "why".

15

Crisis of Conscience

by Freeatlast2024 in

this is my first time posting to this forum.

let me start by saying i was born and raised as a jehovah’s witness.

i’m thankful that i was raised this way, because i feel it protected me in some ways, especially with regard to moral issues.

MeanMrMustard

However, with all the recent changes starting late last year (2023), I started really questioning whether the GB was just making shit up.

Be honest - you've been questioning a lot longer than that.

And that's perfectly fine.

2909

It's been a long 9 years Lloyd Evans / John Cedars (continued)

by Simon in

jw
friends

uh oh, looks like the mega thread gave up the ghost, so while i investigate / fix it just continue the discussion here .... it's been a long 9 years lloyd evans / john cedars.

MeanMrMustard

There, I fixed it:

Hi folks! I'm very sorry, but unfortunately I need to cancel today's Zoom call due to ~~a sickness bug that I have picked up.~~ an unmastered penis I've been wrestling with...

40

Was it Designed?

by Jeffro in

the jw website is currently featuring a piece: the shell of the diabolical ironclad beetle—was it designed?

it is part of their regular tedious 'was it designed?

' series that purports that very very specific animal species must have been specifically designed because of some seemingly amazing feature.. but they seem completely unaware that this directly contradicts their notion that only very broad 'kinds' were required on the mythical 'ark'.

MeanMrMustard

@budbayview: Sounds like a version of the "irreducibly complex" argument.