Posts by Listener

64

Dr Monica Applewhite!

by username in

i'm just listening to this so called doctors testimony.

where did the watchtower dig her up from.

her answers have mostly been maybe's and i think!.

Listener

AudeSapere I can't link directly to the document but it can be found here

http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/exhibits/636f01a5-50db-4b59-a35e-a24ae07fb0ad/case-study-29,-july-2015,-sydney

At the moment it is towards the end as they keep adding documents each day of the hearing. It is called "Statement of Dr Monica Applewhite"

40

JW EXPERT WITNESS FLOORED BY COMMISSION OF INQUIRY LAWYER

by steve2 in

much has already been written about dr monica applewhite, the expert witness hired by the jw organization.

her job was to provide "expert" testimony to the australian commission of inquiry into jehovsh's witnesses' policies and practices on child sexual abuse.

astonishingly, dr applewhite was unprepared for the inquiry lawyers' questions.

They voluntarily put their trust in someone who they say is part of Babylon the Great and Christendom to represent them as an expert Witness before the public, even before the whole World. It backfired on them. The Commission accepted her credentials but found fault with her submission and she even agreed with them about the flaws in their procedures.

You would think they would know better.

15

Does the RC have the names of the 1006 abused victims?

by Dumplin in

i've updated my jw wife on the highlights of the rc proceedings each day as they occur.

but tonight she said something that made my blood boil (which i am usually in complete control of).

she said something to the effect that victims need to not dwell on what happened and let it control their lives.

Listener

Victims can voluntarily contact the commission and a lot of support will be provided to them

18

WT Lawyer trying to force His Honour to allow Miss Apple to garner more info showing how good WT is

by umbertoecho in

hello to all who are watching.

his honour is being tested by wt lawyer in the last thirty minutes of day 4. the lawyer wants to bring in updates on the societies handling of child molestation cases.. his honour tells the lawyer that if he "lawyer" wants a contest between who is better than who....forget it.. his honour is slightly pissed off as wt lawyer just won't back down and insists that this evidence is very important and........"progressive" ( i think ) his honour then continues to tell nice wt jerk type lawyer, that if he thinks this will dispel all that happened to past victims..........think again.. i rough summary but fairly accurate people......god, that wt lawyer is a hateful lying, scheming son of a bitch........

Listener

I doubt she will do it. What she will want to report on will be different to what the org wants her to report on.

98

Anthony Morris III goes on an eight minute rant over child abuse

by Richard_I in

jw
friends

this is in the july 2015 monthly program on tv.jw.org cedars wrote about it too.. starting at around 42:30 in the video, morris talks about the child abuse situation for almost 10 minutes.

link to video.

i'm writing a transcript right now.

Listener

I just had another look at the OP who kindly provides a transcription of the speech AM III gave in the July Broadcast regarding Child Abuse in light of the Royal Commission.

He suggests that he is addressing what the organization is doing and has done in the past about child abuse. I didn't see it the first time around but all he is telling JWs is that they addressed the issue to warn parents in their publications and by a TV ad over a decade ago.

He doesn't explain or address how the organization has dealt with the issue or abusers in the past and how this has helped to protect children. He has provided no proof or defence in demonstrating that their procedures have been appropriate.

47

A few facts to ponder

by Nitty-Gritty in

i have been in correspondence recently with silentambs and a few interesting things have been highlighted.

some of you may know, that bill bowen has twice tried to get the fbi involved in investigating child molestation issues in the jws org.

this is what he said to me, i quote: we have reported to the fbi on two occasions and were rebuffed due to them not wishing to get involved with a religion.

Listener

Nitty Gritty said

<<Well it can't be a wife, as I occupy that role. If it was my sister I would encourage her to go to the police, but I would respect her decision whether to go or not. I could not force her. But she would be obliged to go to the elders to report the sin/crime of a fellow believer. If she didn't go I would report it to the elders for her. If it was my daughter, and she was a minor, I would not need to consult with anyone. I would report the person to the elders and the police immediately, and not necessarily in that order.>>

What biblical basis requires that you inform the elders? You are not under the Mosaic law. You were not a witness to the event and there would not be two witnesses. Under your own JW rules you would be required to approach the Brother with the accusation first.

It's pretty pathetic that you are prepared to take the matter to the elders if she wouldn't and without knowing what is holding her back. She may have been threatened for all you know and going to the elders could potentially make matters much worse.

221

Day 4 Looks to Be Live at Any Moment - Link...and Upcoming Witness List!

by LostGeneration in

https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/636f01a5-50db-4b59-a35e-a24ae07fb0ad/case-study-29,-july-2015,-sydney.

anyone know who this monty baker is?

i'm sure this guy will be able to tell the rc how things work behind the scenes without all the evasiveness, being that he is an "apostate".

Listener

They were already asked to present there documents about procedures, now they are saying there is flexibility within those procedures and they will come from the Branch Office Service desk when an Elder calls. The RC have said they havn't seen anything about that in writing and could they present it.

Seems to me that they are either making it up as they go along and will prepare new light on their current procedures that explain how the Branch Office deals with enquiries or they were negligent in presenting the information in the first place and hid this information. I doubt it would be the second scenario because the RC would quickly recognize that they have broken the law by not presenting it in the first instance.

7

Australian Royal Commission - What can the Governing Body do?

by Listener in

as far as i am aware, it's not within the power of the australian royal commission to call as a witness a non-australian.

it is confined to dealing with the jws and child abuse as it is handled within australia.

it is clear from the testimonies so far that it is the branch office that gives the elders direction as prescribed ultimately by the governing body.. there are two witnesses who have been called up to attend the rc from the branch office in sydney, one is rodney spinks from the service desk and the other is vincent o'toole, overseer of the legal department.

Listener

You are right, Stuckinarut2, he's also the Director of the WTBTS of Australia, I guess they've gone as high as they can. These guys can report from further up in their hierarchy and provide immediate reactions and prove that they are keeping up with Jehovah's fast moving, Celestial Chariot.

7

Australian Royal Commission - What can the Governing Body do?

by Listener in

as far as i am aware, it's not within the power of the australian royal commission to call as a witness a non-australian.

it is confined to dealing with the jws and child abuse as it is handled within australia.

it is clear from the testimonies so far that it is the branch office that gives the elders direction as prescribed ultimately by the governing body.. there are two witnesses who have been called up to attend the rc from the branch office in sydney, one is rodney spinks from the service desk and the other is vincent o'toole, overseer of the legal department.

Listener

As far as I am aware, it's not within the power of the Australian Royal Commission to call as a Witness a Non-Australian. It is confined to dealing with the JWs and child abuse as it is handled within Australia. It is clear from the testimonies so far that it is the Branch Office that gives the elders direction as prescribed ultimately by the Governing Body.

There are two Witnesses who have been called up to attend the RC from the Branch Office in Sydney, one is Rodney Spinks from the Service Desk and the other is Vincent O'Toole, Overseer of the Legal Department. They will know that they will be asked some similar questions already asked to the Elders. There answers will be well scripted but it will be clear that the ultimate direction for dealing with child abuse allegations comes from the Governing Body.

Although the Governing Body members cannot be present this does not mean that they can have no input. All it would take is for information to be provided from them to the Branch Office Witnesses and this can be conveyed during their appearance. There is nothing stopping the Governing Body to take steps now, today or on the weekend advising of any changes or new direction that they feel may be necessary.

Wouldn't it be a fine witness if the Branch Office Witnesses could say that their Governing Body has been closely watching the RC and taken on board all the suggestions that have been made and are immediately willing to make necessary changes, even detailing what these changes will be. That would certainly demonstrate providing food at the proper time.

The onus is on them, the Governing Body, to do this and by doing so would show their full support for the Australian Branch. After all, the elders haven't managed to do a good job on their own so far If they don't wish to make changes, they could chose to advise this to the Branch Office Witnesses so they could convey this information at their hearing. At best, I think these guys will say that the Governing Body are prepared to review any recommendations and will give their full support to any legislative requirements that are made in the future.

My point is, the Government Body does not have to remain silent in this hearing but has the ability to have an active role. Most businesses would see it as damage control, unfortunately the Governing Body has it's own mysterious way of operating.

This is a good opportunity for the likes of Anthony Morris III to prove that he is a 'real man' as he so often likes to say.

17

In View of R.C.hearing of J.W.& child Sexual Abuse in Aust. and it`s Worldwide Coverage.can we expect ....?

by smiddy in

are we likely to see a definite drop in new bible studies , interest in the religion ,a drop in meeting attendance ,especially in lands where this is widely reported ?

or even an exodus from many in the congregations who may view this as the last straw ?.

their have only been 3 days of this inquiry so far and the incompetence of the elders to articulate their position is painful to observe , they are ignorant to the extreme .showing a total disinterest in the whole proceedings.. when questioned , they have not bothered to understand the purpose of the commission , nor read any of the previous days proceedings ,nor have they bothered to read the victims statement ,and have shown a total disregard for the whole procedure .. surely any thinking person with half a brain would back away from any involvement with this religion .. i am overjoyed that this inquiry is getting worldwide media attention ,i hope you are too .. i commented on an article in ghana africa that ran with this story , so the sexual abuse of children within the jehovah`s witness organization is getting worldwide coverage .. what do you think ?.

Listener

Simon Says

<< Repentance is only for the soul. To show God you accepted the consequences for your misdeeds and wish to start new. This is once again for your soul that the churches look for. Anything more serious, the victims are obligated to show just cause to bring charges upon a person. It's the victims obligation to have that person arrested and convicted. To have that person pay for the serious crime, not the church. If a church finds through confession and that confession evil, then The proper authorities get notified. However mans laws as written cannot compile a clergy to under go validating the persons claims, that's up for the law to get the proof needed to being somone to justice. >>

So much of what you say is untrue, I'll address just this paragraph of yours.

Repentance is not just for the soul, it is also a recognition of the wrong you cause to another person. Not only does it show to God that you are sorry for disobeying his laws, it is not complete if you show no recognition of the wrong you have done to another person. Not only are we to love God but we are to love one another.

You say it is the victims responsibility to have the offender arrested and convicted but a child does not understand how to do this and many times they do not even understand how they have been wronged. Often there is a level of guilt that they don't know how to deal with and has been imposed on them by the abuser. Many people think that a wrong will be properly dealt with within their organization because this is what there organization has lead them to believe. That very organization may manipulate them into thinking that they cannot take a crime to worldly authorities. But to say that it is the victims responsibility to have the offender arrested and convicted is absurd. That is the responsibility of the law, law enforcing bodies and the Government. A victim can only use the avenues that are available to them in seeing that justice is done.

Many institutions have hindered the normal process of law and their very position of power over a persons life puts them into a very responsible position. Even at this Royal Commission Elders have admitted that they have a level of responsibility towards the victim. There are many instances within the Catholic Church, for instance, of paying for the psychiatric help required by a victim and that is without any prompting from secular authorities.

You statement that mans laws as written cannot comply a clergy to validate the persons claim is not correct. Where there is mandated reporting many churches comply with this law, including the JWs. Many will actively encourage a victim to report to police even if this is not an obligation imposed by law.