if time travel exists then our past has likely been traveled to and possibly altered.
even though we haven't found a way to harness time doesn't mean that someone will at some point in time if time travel is indeed possible.. so hypothetically, if time travel is real, where do you think people traveled back in time, already, and for what reason?.
-sab.
others are open in some areas, such as seeing beyond those acceptable facts and theories to what can or may be.
To clarify, it's not possibility (as you say, what can or may be) that I was pondering, but belief. There are many, may things yet to be discovered or proven. It is one thing to consider them possible but quite another to believe them to be 100% real.
if time travel exists then our past has likely been traveled to and possibly altered.
even though we haven't found a way to harness time doesn't mean that someone will at some point in time if time travel is indeed possible.. so hypothetically, if time travel is real, where do you think people traveled back in time, already, and for what reason?.
-sab.
Sorry Nickolas, but I'm afraid your a little bit out to lunch with that one.
Ok. Wouldn't be the first time.
it all comes down to evidence (but funny how we tend not to accept the evidence that indicates that what be actually believe to be true might be wrong).. this is a statement made by nick in previous thread of his.. >>>>>>>>>>.
if the ot 'god' reappeared today, would that be evidence of 'god'?.
jay, .
One of the rumours surronding the advanced use of metals in Stealth aircraft was that it was "alien technology" from the Roswell crash.
if time travel exists then our past has likely been traveled to and possibly altered.
even though we haven't found a way to harness time doesn't mean that someone will at some point in time if time travel is indeed possible.. so hypothetically, if time travel is real, where do you think people traveled back in time, already, and for what reason?.
-sab.
Perhaps there is more of a correlation between non-belief in anything supernatural, and people who are unable or unwilling to believe in anything beyond accepted scientific theory/evidence.
That would be the corollary of my observation, Tammy. How would you typify people who are able or willing to believe in anything beyond accepted scientific theory/evidence?
it all comes down to evidence (but funny how we tend not to accept the evidence that indicates that what be actually believe to be true might be wrong).. this is a statement made by nick in previous thread of his.. >>>>>>>>>>.
if the ot 'god' reappeared today, would that be evidence of 'god'?.
jay, .
I am agnostic about extraterrestrials, PS. It seems to me that with all the alleged UFO sightings, alien abductions and crop circles that if extraterrestrials exist they're either disinterested or inept at keeping their presence a secret. Yet there is no verified photograph or video footage or advanced metallurgical sample or other hard evidence that they exist. Crop circles don't qualify because they can be, and are, explainable as manmade, even when extremely complex. Especially when extremely complex. There's a lot of speculation that government is covering it all up, but what for? And if so, how is the coverup so effective if the phenomenon is so widespread? I'm not saying that life doesn't exist on other planets in the Milky Way, because I think it is quite likely. I just don't think they're here, for reasons I have asserted in other threads and won't repeat on this one.
There are, as well, people who scoff at the notion of crop circles being made by extraterrestrials but maintain that there is some sort of supernatural or paranormal explanation instead. For the record, I reject those reasons as well. I'm an equal opportunity sceptic. Yes, there are some crop circles that are apparently unexplainable, but that doesn't mean the default conclusion must be aliens or whatever. And it doesn't mean that those investigating them are particularly adept at uncovering the secret of their production.
I think people make crop circles and making them as complex and puzzling as possible is the entire objective.
if time travel exists then our past has likely been traveled to and possibly altered.
even though we haven't found a way to harness time doesn't mean that someone will at some point in time if time travel is indeed possible.. so hypothetically, if time travel is real, where do you think people traveled back in time, already, and for what reason?.
-sab.
Is it my imagination or is there a correlation between belief in things supernatural and belief in things that defy the known laws of physics and accepted scientific theory / evidence? The number of people in here who believe in UFOs, extraterrestrial visitations, superluminal travel and time travel to the past seems a bit higher than the norm.
the new wt is up.
the worst article is the first one, a non-study article.
shows pictures of a kid, looks like he is 10 years old.
sad world.
good night.
my son in-law.
he has been in the borg all his life, 40yrs.
old.. df two or three times, never a ms or elder.
hang in there, jam.
feeling a bit silly tonight, so i thought i'd try my hand at some limericks.
feel free to add some more:.
two witnesses just newly wed. tried to get friskie in bed.
A virgin I've been all my life
Not allowed a chance at a wife
Now I'm seventy-five
and my thing ain't alive
might as well cut it off with a knife
if time travel exists then our past has likely been traveled to and possibly altered.
even though we haven't found a way to harness time doesn't mean that someone will at some point in time if time travel is indeed possible.. so hypothetically, if time travel is real, where do you think people traveled back in time, already, and for what reason?.
-sab.
Could be, BTS, but the receiver was normally positioned in a pocket, not placed beside the ear. What's in the ear is that little black and white fixture at the end of the switch cord.
Edit. Seems you're right, SBC. Same identicon. Welcome back, BTS.
Edit edit: unless, of course, she's deaf as a post and likes talking to herself.
