I've often wondered if Adam is the perfect man, then why is he so, um, modestly endowed?
Nickolas
JoinedPosts by Nickolas
-
176
For non-believers: What evidence would it take for you to believe in 'god'?
by jay88 init all comes down to evidence (but funny how we tend not to accept the evidence that indicates that what be actually believe to be true might be wrong).. this is a statement made by nick in previous thread of his.. >>>>>>>>>>.
if the ot 'god' reappeared today, would that be evidence of 'god'?.
jay, .
-
-
-
50
If time travel exists
by sabastious inif time travel exists then our past has likely been traveled to and possibly altered.
even though we haven't found a way to harness time doesn't mean that someone will at some point in time if time travel is indeed possible.. so hypothetically, if time travel is real, where do you think people traveled back in time, already, and for what reason?.
-sab.
-
-
Nickolas
Proof of time travel? What is she talking into?
The guy's had too much Bushmills. What is in her hand is a dry icepack. She's either got a dental absess or has just had a tooth extracted. She's moving her jaw because it hurts like hell. -
176
For non-believers: What evidence would it take for you to believe in 'god'?
by jay88 init all comes down to evidence (but funny how we tend not to accept the evidence that indicates that what be actually believe to be true might be wrong).. this is a statement made by nick in previous thread of his.. >>>>>>>>>>.
if the ot 'god' reappeared today, would that be evidence of 'god'?.
jay, .
-
-
Nickolas
LOL. Nice try, but crop circles are nothing new, and they are not all hoaxes. They have been forming for hundreds of years. The hoaxes are to discredit the real ones, for the same reason that your ruling elite have covered up alien visitation.
LOL? My JW brother-in-law scoffs like that too when you tell him that mankind's been around more than 6,000 years, or Noah's Ark was impossible, or Armageddon is not just around the corner, or ...
-
50
If time travel exists
by sabastious inif time travel exists then our past has likely been traveled to and possibly altered.
even though we haven't found a way to harness time doesn't mean that someone will at some point in time if time travel is indeed possible.. so hypothetically, if time travel is real, where do you think people traveled back in time, already, and for what reason?.
-sab.
-
-
Nickolas
Yes, PSac, just a little more succinctly.
-
50
If time travel exists
by sabastious inif time travel exists then our past has likely been traveled to and possibly altered.
even though we haven't found a way to harness time doesn't mean that someone will at some point in time if time travel is indeed possible.. so hypothetically, if time travel is real, where do you think people traveled back in time, already, and for what reason?.
-sab.
-
-
Nickolas
A fundamental rule that governs the universe is that causes happen before effects, not the other way around. If it was the other way around, then things could make themselves impossible. Travelling in time to the past suffers from the problem of paradox, which is much like audio feedback when sound waves from the speakers enter the microphone, go into a fatal loop and progressively collide faster and faster and louder and louder. If not corrected, the sound system will destroy itself, along with your eardrums. With time travel to the past the problem becomes radiation feedback, which would cause essentially the same sort of result.
Einstein postulated that time is like a river. It flows in only one direction but at wildly different speeds in different places. His proof shows that time travel is, indeed, possible, but only into the future, and may be achieved in one of two ways: physically travelling in an area of extreme gravity or travelling close to c, the speed of light. Stephen Hawking expanded on the concept recently by calculating that a really, really big spacecraft with a huge amount of fuel could attain speeds approaching c after about six years' of acceleration. But it would begin to travel in time after only 4 years. When the ship attained .99 c, for every day on board the spaceship an entire year will have passed back on Earth. If the course of the ship was circular and the crew started its decelleration sequence after, say, three months, by the time they returned to their starting point they would have been in space for a little over 12 years but would step foot on Earth about 150 years after they left.
You can never go back, but someday you may be able to go forward. Don't hold your breath, though.
-
62
June 15th WT, Trap Your Kids in the Cult
by LostGeneration inthe new wt is up.
the worst article is the first one, a non-study article.
shows pictures of a kid, looks like he is 10 years old.
-
-
Nickolas
Effed up religion bruh.......
amen
-
62
June 15th WT, Trap Your Kids in the Cult
by LostGeneration inthe new wt is up.
the worst article is the first one, a non-study article.
shows pictures of a kid, looks like he is 10 years old.
-
-
Nickolas
Three of my nephews were baptised at age 12. Two still in, one a bethelite and the other a pioneer, the other DF'ed and shunned. Only half the kids in the family took the plunge. The unbaptised siblings (who do not shun their brother) are still considered part of the family, although the way they are living their lives is arguably, from the biblical standpoint, less "moral" than their DF'ed brother. This is a cancer in the WTBTS that I hope rots it from the inside out.
-
21
JW Limericsk - Add your own!
by pirata infeeling a bit silly tonight, so i thought i'd try my hand at some limericks.
feel free to add some more:.
two witnesses just newly wed. tried to get friskie in bed.
-
-
Nickolas
There once was two brothers who heard
That the Watchtower wasn't the Word
to the old outhouse they took them
where the old rotten floor forsook them
And now they're together interred
-
176
For non-believers: What evidence would it take for you to believe in 'god'?
by jay88 init all comes down to evidence (but funny how we tend not to accept the evidence that indicates that what be actually believe to be true might be wrong).. this is a statement made by nick in previous thread of his.. >>>>>>>>>>.
if the ot 'god' reappeared today, would that be evidence of 'god'?.
jay, .
-
-
-
172
The impossible delusion of evolution
by brotherdan inhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1icjkwzeee.
.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=azmgkrkj5la.
-
-
Nickolas
If you use at least your same standards of proving or dismissing evolution as you do for proving or dismissing the Bible and Christianity, you will become an unbeliever.
This one is particularly intriguing. Is there an expanded dialogue?