Interesting comments. Thanks everyone for some intelligent thoughts.
I posted the incident, as I wondered how it may develop, in comparison to the threads on young black Americans, and the current controversies in the USA that bear some similarities and many differences to the Aussie situation.
Many Indigenous Australians do 'make it' in contemporary Australian society. And, even in JW society. 'Uncle Bruce,' posted on XJW sites for a long time with some insightful thoughts. I've also heard of a family in Sydney's west. And others in various places. In northern Queensland there are many Torres Strait Islanders who are JWs (and probably some XJWs-grin) who come from the islands between Cape York peninsula and Papua, and are usually grouped, for administrative purposes, with Indigenous Australians.
zeb raised an interesting point, in his comment:
saying "he held to kid down with all his weight" is dramatic but quite untrue. and, is a point being made here that that kid was Aboriginal? He is the palest indigenous i have ever seen if he is. I seriously doubt that footage is from the Northern territory.
I see no reason to doubt the ABC's statement or the belief of the people in the report, that counts the boy as Indigenous. But your comment raises the question, just who counts as an Indigenous Australian? For the benefit of anyone not familiar with the issue, there's a heap of emotion in the question. Why? Well, imho, many people are upset at the fact that while Indigenous Australians form 3% of the population, about 6% of government expenditure goes to Indigenous Australians. Broken down, that is $43,449 per person in 2012-13 financial year (compared to an average of $20,900 per person for other Australians, in the same year). And yet, as those who complain about the expenditure, there are such poor results, and the destructive behaviour evident in the video is common.
So how is an Indigenous Australian identified. There have been a number of legal decisions on this, but the result is this:
The Australian Bureau of Statistics defines an Indigenous person as a person of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander descent who identifies as an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander and is accepted as such by the community in which he or she lives. There are three components to the definition: descent; self-identification; and community acceptance.
and, here are some words from Indigenous people themselves.
We are the Indigenous peoples of Australia — Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.
Aboriginal people are those whose traditional cultures and lands lie on the mainland and most of the islands, including Tasmania, Fraser Island, Palm Island, Mornington Island, Groote Eylandt, Bathurst and Melville Islands.
The Torres Strait Islands lie between the northern tip of Cape York in Queensland and the south-west coast of Papua New Guinea. The Torres Strait Islanders have many cultural similarities with the peoples of Papua New Guinea and the Pacific. ...
The term 'Aboriginal' has become one of the most disputed in the Australian language.
The Commonwealth definition is social more than racial, in keeping with the change in Australian attitudes away from racialist thinking about other peoples. An Aboriginal person is defined as a person who is a descendent of an Indigenous inhabitant of Australia, identifies as an Aboriginal, and is recognised as Aboriginal by members of the community in which he or she lives. [The same three components, descent, self-identification and community acceptance, are used for Torres Strait Islanders.]
This definition is preferred by the vast majority of our people over the racial definitions of the assimilationist era. ...
Link (for the above): http://www.whatworks.edu.au/1_1_1.htm
How then, can a 'white' looking boy be counted as an Indigenous Australian? I can only generalise about the boy in this way. There must be very few fully 100% Indigenous Australians in Australia. In the 19th century it was common for young white settlers to have a bit of "black velvet" as they were growing up. And, its still common. The boy is likely the child of a 'mixed blood' (awful term) and a white looking male. The male could have 'gone missing' soon after conception and the boy in question then raised in an Indigenous community. He may, not yet, personally identify as Indigenous, but he likely will.
To be honest, I likely have some indigenous background (from the 19th C). I believe that at least one grandmother was part Indigenous.
So that's my explanation of how the boy can look white, and still be an Indigenous Australian.