So where was this heading. I wanted to use Pudong as a metaphor for change (in China). Last night, discussing a new trade treaty, the Australian Prime Minister described the changes in China (particularly since 1980) as the greatest movement to prosperity that the world has ever seen.
He apparently believes that the new treaty locks Australia into the increasing Chinese prosperity, as it will allow Australian primary products, and Australian service industries free access to the Chinese market and economy.
In Pudong, the Australian business men I mentioned earlier did not believe that the first high-rise building heralded anything. Based on their own experience, they could not believe that the miniscule (as it was then) Chinese economy would ever develop as it has. But it did happen and it seems in the PM's opinion that Australian prosperity is (at least in part) is dependent.
Another anecdote. In the early 2000s (2003 or 4, I think), John Howard, the then PM of Australia made his second visit to Cina (and first to Shanghai) and got to his hotel in Shanghai at night. The story goes that in his suite, his staff opened the window drapes to reveal the lighted buildings of Pudong.
Howard was gob-smacked, "Shit!!!" he is supposed to have exclaimed, "how long has this been going on?"