I doubt that the person we understand to be 'Saul/Paul' would be seriously interested in discussing a world view that did away with mythos as a way of explaining our presence in the universe.
I do agree with Glenster however, that there was a possibility that Saul/Paul was likely influenced by later Hellenic philosophy (Plato). Early Christianity certainly was. Paul's hometown of Tarsus was Hellenic in culture and Strabo mentions the town's high hellenic culture and its philosophers, poets and linguists. At one time the library in Tarsus is claimed to have had 200,00 books including a large number of what could be called scientific works. How much that background influenced Saul/Paul is difficult to assess,as Acts 23:6 records his words that he belonged to the sect of the pharisee's and that he was the son of a pharisee. Whether that was a serious belief, or merely a convenient thing to say during his interrogation is open to other assessments
It's also recorded in Acts 26:4 that he was a youth in Jerusalem and came to be taught by Gamaliel. Even in Jerusalem though, he would not escape the prevailing hellenic culture, as it pervaded all of Palestine.
Putting this sparse information together I suggest that it can be concluded that Saul/Paul would, at least' have had some understanding of hellenic thinking and perhaps the writings of the pre-socratic greek philosophers who had initiated a more rational approach to explaining the question - "why/how does the world exist?"
In a discussion though, Paul would likely come down firmly on the side of the creationists.
But Christ Alone is not correct when he claims that in Paul's era, evolution was not even dreamed about. The pre-socratic Greek philosophers, starting around the 6th century BCE, in their search for rational explanations for the existence of everything, headed toward the concept of evolution.
Greek thought was an amazing flowering of the human intellect, but what is more amazing is that it was repeated on the other side of the euro-asian land mass, with Chinese thinking reflecting a similar search for understanding. That search resulted in the humanist concepts of Kongzi and the 'universal love' teachings of Mozi, and the Daoist concepts of Laozi, which sought to know the way of tian, which is not heaven, as we may understand the word, but referring to way the universe operates. The ideas of those teachers were also subjected to sceptical enquiry (something like the 'peer review' of modern scholarship) that was often very critical. And approaching the question of why and how things exist, we get (in Chinese thought) to the 4th century CE and Guo Xiang's commentary on the Zhuangzi.
And, in that we find the full flowering of rational thought:
" ... therefore all things exist by themselves and come from nature. This is the way of heaven." (NB again. tian=heaven= the universe.)
The idea of evolution is much older that some wish to admit.