The Watchtower is editing the Wikipedia and information written about them. The evidence is here:
http://wikiscanner.virgil.gr/f.php?ip1=208.210.221.70
For more interesting searches, try this:
Posts by Kent
-
6The Watchtower EDIT Wikipedia!
by Kent inthe watchtower is editing the wikipedia and information written about them.
the evidence is here:.
http://wikiscanner.virgil.gr/f.php?ip1=208.210.221.70.
-
-
-
-
-
Kent
Well, your problem is that you don't get it - and I can't explain it to you either. But really, I don't care. I hope you're happy inside your tiny box.
Have a nice life...
-
-
-
Kent
I think the idea of going swimming or bathing with the gods was a great idea. So, the Jehovah's Witlesses has just found New Light about the subject.
Our new page, Go Swimming With Jehovah should be of interest for YOUNG female witlesses.
Let's Go Swimming folks!
-
-
-
Kent
Yeah, those are fun. But try this one as well. Maybe you will like it, he, he....
-
-
-
Kent
Well, I admit it's not for everyone to get it. But, if you work hard, study the facts, and start thinking real hard, you might find a thing like "fun" can be really important.
Some people are so "serious" that talk about them selves in capital letters, and please do. I don't care. But you can have your fun, I don't mind at all. If my fun irritates you, I already managed my goal.
Just taking a piss? I'm sorry. I leave that to the ones that do have problems understanding.
-
-
-
Kent
Tasteless? I'm just as interested in what you feel about that as watching paint drying on the wall. I didn't make that site to make you happy, you know.
-
-
-
Kent
Well, there will be a comment place there, or maybe a Questions From Readers? Ask Jehovah?
That will be fixed, probably next week or so
-
10
MSNBC Catches Pedophiles On Camera
by golf2 inevery monday night starting 10pm, msnbc along with authorities trap pedophiles who have made internet arrangements to have sex with under-age children are filmed and exposed to the public.
this passed monday night, they arrested 21 pedophiles making such arrangements.
the one that caught my interest was the pedophile having to travel 350 miles (one way) to have sex with a teenager!
-
-
Kent
I hope they will film this bastard! http://www.usdoj.gov/marshals/investigations/most_wanted/mclean15.pdf
-
-
-
Kent
There is quite a few new pages there now. This one ius fun. Maybe someone copuld call the boyz and tape the conversation? I can publish the fun you know :) http://www.watchtower.no/call.htm
-
-
-
Kent
I did look at www.pornolize.com, but that wasn't any good, I believe. Just adding "bad words" into the text here and there isn't what I'm looking for.
I've written many letters about pornolizer's short-sighted contrivances. Maybe it's wrong to fixate so much on this one topic, but I assure you that my arguments are not wrong. Before I launch into my main topic, I want to make a few matters crystal-clear: (1) Education without action creates frustration, while action without education leads to solecism, and (2) as a result of that, pornolizer relies on stichomancy to "prove" that it's inappropriate to teach children right from wrong. Now that you know where I stand on those issues, I can safely say that it has stated that it's okay for it to indulge its every whim and lust without regard for anyone else or for society as a whole. That's just pure blackguardism. Well, in pornolizer's case, it might be pure ignorance, seeing that pornolizer managed to convince a bunch of detestable lowbrows of one sort or another to help it produce nothing but filth. What was the quid pro quo there? Well, while you're deliberating over that, let me ask you another question: What in perdition does it think it's doing? Now, not to bombard you with too many questions, but its inclinations will have consequences -- very serious consequences. And we ought to begin doing something about that. Pornolizer's statements such as "It's okay if pornolizer's projects initially cause our quality of life to degrade because 'sometime', 'someone' will do 'something' 'somehow' to counteract that trend" indicate that we're not all looking at the same set of facts. Fortunately, these facts are easily verifiable with a trip to the library by any open and honest individual. As it turns out, some people say that that isn't sufficient evidence to prove that pornolizer is secretly scheming to implement a slaphappy parody of justice called "pornolizer-ism". And I must agree; one needs much more evidence than that. But the evidence is there, for anyone who isn't afraid to look at it. Just look at the way that before pornolizer initiated a McCarthyism flap to help promote its witless conjectures, people everywhere were expected to enhance people's curiosity, critical acumen, and aesthetic sensitivity. Nowadays, it's the rare person indeed who realizes that if pornolizer's thinking were cerebral rather than glandular, it wouldn't consider it such a good idea to grasp at straws, trying to find increasingly materialistic ways to abandon me on a desert island.
The key to pornolizer's soul is its longing for the effortless, irresponsible, automatic consciousness of an animal. It dreads the necessity, the risk, and the responsibility of rational cognition. As a result, pornolizer is out to elevate its wisecracks to prominence as epistemological principles. And when we play its game, we become accomplices. If pornolizer isn't brain-damaged, I don't know who is. Pornolizer's a psychologically defective organization. It's what the psychiatrists call a constitutional psychopath or a sociopath.
If some people are offended by my mentioning that pornolizer's analects are grounded in phony acts of kindness, then so be it. Unlike pornolizer, when I make a mistake I'm willing to admit it. Consequently, if -- and I'm bending over backwards to maintain the illusion of "innocent until proven guilty" -- it were not actually responsible for trying to push our efforts two steps backward, then I'd stop saying that we were put on this planet to be active, to struggle, and to warn the public against those stingy roustabouts whose positive accomplishments are always practically nil, but whose conceit can scarcely be excelled. We were not put here to exercise control through indirect coercion or through psychological pressure or manipulation, as pornolizer might maintain. You might think that anyone who doesn't know that pornolizer is disruptive must be inhabiting a different world. Well, if that's the case, then I'm afraid pornolizer's vassals must have spent the past month on Mars. I, hardheaded cynic that I am, challenge you to ponder this subject with the broadest vision possible.