I sent this email:
Hi
Thank you for highlighting the plight of anyone unlucky enough to be disfellowshipped or considered to have disassociated themselves by their actions (which has the exact same consequences) by the Jehovah's Witnesses religion. With reference to the official statement from the JW legal department: "Witnesses do not shun family members because of differences in religious beliefs. Many Witnesses have religiously mixed families and enjoy normal loving relationships together. If a family member who is a baptized Witness is disfellowshipped the spiritual ties he had with his family change, but blood ties remain. Accordingly, the marriage relationship and normal family affections and dealings can continue. As for disfellowshipped relatives not living in the same household we apply the counsel from the Bible at 1 Corinthians: "quit mixing with them." The scriptures are sacred to us and we therefore take this counsel seriously. The degree of family contact is a personal decision based on one's Bible trained conscience. If there are consequences, these relate primarily to one's relationship with God." The first part refers exclusively to 'family members' living in the same household, such as between a parent and minor child or a husband and wife. The JW's refer to these are 'family members' but consider those not living at home to be 'relatives'. Therefore, a disfellowshipped son not living at home is not considered a family member. The second part refers to those 'relatives' not living at home, but who may be as closely related as between mother and son. To these, the requirement is that family members must "quit mixing with them." Therefore, since the JW's have a special definition of what constitutes a 'family member', the first sentence is deliberately misleading to those not familiar with their particular narrow definitions. Equally misleading is the statement that "the degree of family contact is a personal decision" because although it is true an individual can decide for themselves, if they continue to associate they too may be disfellowshipped and shunned. This is alluded to in the following and final sentence warning of "consequences" to do with "one's relationship with God", which, as any JW knows, actually means they too risk being disfellowshipped. I wil not comment on the odd JW interpretation of 1 Corinthians since that is subjective.