Ok, let's look at the atheist's position logically. No Bible required.
Atheist ascert that
in the entire universe
there has never existed in the past
nor now existing in the present
nor will ever exist in the future
any god, gods, or goddesses
of any size, shape, or description.
First, what we have in this sentence is what is termed in logic a universe negative. Universal negatives can not be proven. Since universal negatives can not be proven or demonstrated then to affirm a universal negative is irrational.
Secondly, in order to prove that there is no god, one must become God.
A. You must be everywhere at one time, therefore omnipresent and infinite.
B. You must be able to travel from the past, to the present, and into the future at the same time. This means you would be eternal.
C. You must be able to know all things. Making you omniscient.
D. In order to be omnipresent, infinite, eternal and omniscient you would need to be omnipotent. Therefore, you would be God.
If only an infinite, eternal, omnipresent, omniscient, omnipotent God can declare that there is no God, then you have a self-contradictory statement which is a violation of logic, and is also irrational.
So folks, it is more of a "blind leap" to be an atheist. Atheiism is a blind leap because it is irrational and illogical.
See how easy that was? No name calling, no straw men, just looking at the view with plain hard logic.
ThiChi, this is "free thinking", maybe you should try it.
DanielHaase, I do not have blind faith in the Bible. The book has been affirmed by people more learned than you or I (I will not bore you with the names, besides they are out there if you choose to look for them).
FunkyDerek, if you quote the Bible please remember that a passage out of context is a pretext for a prooftext. Funny how old JW habits refuse to die. [8>]
Please have fun, and play nice
"That's me in the corner. That's me in the spotlight, losing my religion." REM
And thank God I lost my religion.
The Big Dawg