Dear EndofMysteries,
There is a way to approach the Bible in a scholarly kind of way that can lead to a well rounded sense of what it is saying. It is interesting to note that most Protestants, Catholics, and Orthodox believe the same in theology by a large portion. It is only the fringe radical groups such as the Watchtower religion, Mormons, and other small groups that have a unusual and unique approach to scriptures that have deviated from the mainstream.
The following are ways that helped me after leaving the WT corporation
I bought three different Bible in different translations that had commentaries at the bottom that I could look up concerning the scriptures. Each commentary Bible was made from a different group. Some Bibles I had came from the Catholic church, another was the Orthodox church and a one or two others were from Protestant branches, such as Baptists, Lutherans, Prespyterian and so forth.
These comments they gave then I could cross reference with 99 percent of Christianity. Surprisingly the majority of the verses were commented on in the same way.
It does not surprise me that the Watchtower religion has not put out a commentary Bible because their theology changes almost as regularly as fresh magazines come out.
The next thing I did was research the history of what people thought on scriptures going back to the early writings just outside the Bible. These included key historical figures such as Luther, Augustine, St Ignacious, and others to the early history. Certain new understandings were a red flag for me.
You can find these documents such as the Didache and the writings of St. Ignatious online.
In this way you not only have a balanced understanding of what people believe today how the Bible is being translated but also how far back historically those views go.
Ironically the Watchtower has changed so much in the last 100 years it could be defined as a completely different religion by now. In contrast most of current beliefs of mainstream Christianity have held up for 2000 years. Some new beliefs for example are the rapture, which is about 100 years new.
There will be differences though.
I think these suggestions are the best place for a person to start after leaving the Corporation. We don't have to go at it alone but can rely on an exegesis developed by many learned peoples coupled with historicity to balance ourselves in getting a more clear understanding.
Thirdly, a bit of eductation on hermenutics and exegesis never hurt but I don't think that is necessary. Those are things WT members don't learn.
Last thought, I would stay away from commentary Bibles that were not written within a public peer reviewed commitee.
Also praying before starting to read is always a good thing.
Anyways, Hope that helps
Peace
Maksym