But Tammy, that just intensifies the problem. Regarding this quote: when actually the lying pen of the scribes has handled it falsely?... by their own admission we can't trust the scribes. In that way, we can't trust any of it. All that was written about Jesus could be false just as easily as all that was written about the OT god may be false. And remember "just as in the time of Noah . . . " As I said, same god, same story. This reference proves that Christians believed that their god destroyed everyone but 8 in a great flood.
If I am reading a book on science, and some of it's own authors claim that some of the other authors wrote false things, in the same book--well then the entire book is suspect. I can't trust it. Now I know the bible wasn't written as the same book, but it was the same subject and it was all written by scribes. According to that scripture-some of those scribes wrote false things. I have nothing against Jesus, he taught valuable lessons--at least as presented by scribes that may have portrayed him falsely. If god is almighy and his word is so important that he refers to his son as the word, I do believe it would be in his interest to protect that word. It would be the loving thing to do anyway--so he either protected it or he didn't. If he didn't, and that seems to be what you are saying, then I can trust none of it---including the parts about Jesus.
NC