it is an uncomfortable thing to view but a perfect paradigm of evolution.
Half banana referring to "survival of the fittest"
there is no sentimentality in the real scientific world of nature.
I was never a JW and visit this board only to gain from others experience. I am a Christian, not much of one,
but that's another story. I see that many posters here have rejected the existence of God based on the
"problem of evil". This problem is not new of course and has its own name (theodicy) and is unlikely to
be settled in a forum post. I usually visit here for JW insight but in this thread I see an opportunity to ask
for another kind and I am genuinely asking. In the USA April 15 is evil but that also another story.
This man
was J. Bruce Ismay. You can read about Bruce at Wikipedia. Was he evil on April 15 1912?
Can you identify with Bruce in any way? Any sentiment at all? Was Bruce only driven by a proven scientific
principle? Please don't hear this as questioning evolution. It takes more pesticides / antibiotics. Case closed.
Next case. Evolution exists and is a topic for consideration. Evil exists and is a topic for consideration. Was
J. Bruce Ismay,
Leslie Van Houton, me and you altogether molecules? In my culture there are few
people openly unbelievers, hypocrites aplently but that still another story. I honestly am asking, how do
self professed unbelievers explain evil?