i was never a jw but i lurk in this forum occasionally, trying to rescue some family.
i will spare you those details.. jw.org and jwfacts are there with youtubes out the wazoo but i would appreciate your thought on this.. i know there are contradictions plenty but this is foundational, blatant and current.
i know they typically just blow off.
I was never a JW but i lurk in this forum occasionally, trying to rescue some family. I will spare you those details.
JW.ORG and JWFACTS are there with YOUTUBEs out the wazoo but I would appreciate your thought on this.
I know there are contradictions plenty but this is foundational, blatant and current. I know they typically just blow off
contradictions so how might it sound here?
current public talk outlines.
blank page between each talk.. .
https://docdro.id/w209l0s.
Thank you
I never was a Jw. Is there a way to know the schedule for these talks?
Jerry
i never was a jw.
my question is pretty simple.
this watchtower is for january.
Tks sir82
i never was a jw.
my question is pretty simple.
this watchtower is for january.
I never was a JW. My question is pretty simple. This Watchtower is for January. Does that mean the whole month?
What does that mean? When will they study this?
i am having trouble locating what is the 1914 prophecy?
jw.org states that the jw's accurately predicted the events of 1914, but do not indicate what the predictions were, or the specific fulfillments.
what do jw's think they are (predictions/fulfillments)?
acer21 even though this isn't helpful to your finding references to 1914, it is interesting.
quote "she doesn't say too much" is why your search is difficult. pot / kettle
we had a nice long talk and i brought up some things that make me think that this isn't the "truth" and she somewhat agreed with me.
i stuck with things i personally experienced or had knowledge of plus all the changes in recent years.
she agreed on a lot of the points but still believes in god and the bible.
JW_Rogue, I never was a Witness and only lurk in this forum occasionally. The reason for my post is
because your say your wife believes in God and the Bible. So do I and this reference below is to the
most educational post I ever read here. You will see the OP was by Cofty. You will also see that he says
he no longer believes in the Bible but he is spot on. He may not believe it but the man knows what it says.
a woman gets an abortion.
the baby is supposed to die because of the abortion but doesn’t.
should that living baby be put to death or should the baby be given medical help to survive?.
This lady survived her own abortion.
Her story is worth a listen.
many have spent years associated with jws religion and having eventually left it for numerous reasons but if you were to directly pinpoint a source of the problem with this religious organization what would it be ?.
in my personal viewpoint it would have be the core operation of literature proliferation and other products associated with the wts.
corporation.. once you think about it everything is focused around the operation of the wts publishing house, its distribution and circulation of its published goods.
from a theological perspective
*** w67 12/15 p. 753 par. 1 What Now Distinguishes the Good News to Be Preached ***
EVER since the end of the Gentile Times in 1914 something of very present importance has been added to the “good news of God” that Jesus Christ used to preach . . .
this post is necessarily lengthy, but my hope is that these 14 examples of wtbts dogma will be examined closely by those who either have something to gain by doing so, or those who can provide "new light" for any of the topics.. "however, you may say in your heart: “how will we know that jehovah has not spoken the word?” when the prophet speaks in the name of jehovah and the word is not....true, then jehovah did not speak that word.
you should not fear him.
" [the prophet] (deuteronomy 18:21-22) .
Thank you fall guy this is really helpful.
Number 4 (Rom.6:7) is especially a problem for JW dogma. All that necessary is read verse 8 which
is plainly referring to the death of Jesus. Which leads to a question that I have.
The dogma says the death of Rom.6:7 refers to the death of the JW personally not Jesus.
This then allows Rom.6:23 to be satisfied which is obviously not Paul's point in this text.
But if we grant their dogma here that a person's own death satisfies verse 23 then how does
a person who survives Armageddon pay for his sin since he has not ever died. Why would
such a person qualify for the new system? What am I missing on this?
