Whether or not the Flood can be substantiated notwithstanding the archaeological and biological evidences against it is an altogether different argument.
So, do you think there is evidence for the flood? By flood, allow me to be specific as in the Global Flood as described in the Bible that most fundamentalists, Jehovah's Witnesses included, accept as literal, factual history.
I know your busy with reviewing Gentile Times, but I think proving/disproving the veracity of the Biblical accounts or at least the perceptions held of them seem rather an important issue, don't you? The Gentile Times is mainly a JW topic, whereas divine authorship of the Bible permeates to the other branches of Christianity, and ultimately saves us a lot of time on our quest for truth.