No fornicators will inherit God's Kingdom.
What's you're obsession with sex? Did I hit a nerve?
Go get a real job, Mr. EntirelyPossible.
I do have a real job. It pays quite well.
i just thought i'd share something if you don't mind.. my conviction in the legitimacy of the society was slowy eroded over a number of years simply by reading the publications and becoming increasingly frustrated at how little the interpretations of prophecy and scripture made sense, added to the complete ineptitude of senior figures in the organisation.. for me, the "glue" that kept everything roughly held together into something that can be called a "faith" was the concept of "increasing light", which as you all know is the principle employed by the society to excuse any mistakes or backtracks that are made.
they routinely flog proverbs 4:18, which as we all know has nothing to do with gradual refinements in understanding when read in context.
regardless of this, the concept managed to keep me loyal to the organisation for quite some time, as i was too fearful to bring it under direct scrutiny.
No fornicators will inherit God's Kingdom.
What's you're obsession with sex? Did I hit a nerve?
Go get a real job, Mr. EntirelyPossible.
I do have a real job. It pays quite well.
i just thought i'd share something if you don't mind.. my conviction in the legitimacy of the society was slowy eroded over a number of years simply by reading the publications and becoming increasingly frustrated at how little the interpretations of prophecy and scripture made sense, added to the complete ineptitude of senior figures in the organisation.. for me, the "glue" that kept everything roughly held together into something that can be called a "faith" was the concept of "increasing light", which as you all know is the principle employed by the society to excuse any mistakes or backtracks that are made.
they routinely flog proverbs 4:18, which as we all know has nothing to do with gradual refinements in understanding when read in context.
regardless of this, the concept managed to keep me loyal to the organisation for quite some time, as i was too fearful to bring it under direct scrutiny.
Rule number uno. When insulting, name your target JERK STUPID FACE FUCK
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!
You yelled at a shitload of people calling them stupid jerk fuck face without naming them even as you said the first rule was to say who you were insulting.
What is wrong with you people?
I'll just presume you were talking to yourself since you broke the very rule you made up as you were ranting about other people doing it.
Jesus would be proud of you. Oh, wait, he wouldn't. He would condemn you for your hate.
i just thought i'd share something if you don't mind.. my conviction in the legitimacy of the society was slowy eroded over a number of years simply by reading the publications and becoming increasingly frustrated at how little the interpretations of prophecy and scripture made sense, added to the complete ineptitude of senior figures in the organisation.. for me, the "glue" that kept everything roughly held together into something that can be called a "faith" was the concept of "increasing light", which as you all know is the principle employed by the society to excuse any mistakes or backtracks that are made.
they routinely flog proverbs 4:18, which as we all know has nothing to do with gradual refinements in understanding when read in context.
regardless of this, the concept managed to keep me loyal to the organisation for quite some time, as i was too fearful to bring it under direct scrutiny.
But in Hebrews 9: 27 it says that we will all be judged after we die.
But if the dead are conscious of nothing at all, then who cares?
Why would God judge us if just trying to be good were enough?
Because Jesus also tells us that no one is good apart from God, so we are being judged on an impossible standard.
That bible just can't seem to make up it's mind!
i just thought i'd share something if you don't mind.. my conviction in the legitimacy of the society was slowy eroded over a number of years simply by reading the publications and becoming increasingly frustrated at how little the interpretations of prophecy and scripture made sense, added to the complete ineptitude of senior figures in the organisation.. for me, the "glue" that kept everything roughly held together into something that can be called a "faith" was the concept of "increasing light", which as you all know is the principle employed by the society to excuse any mistakes or backtracks that are made.
they routinely flog proverbs 4:18, which as we all know has nothing to do with gradual refinements in understanding when read in context.
regardless of this, the concept managed to keep me loyal to the organisation for quite some time, as i was too fearful to bring it under direct scrutiny.
Sorry monkey. You know I love you. Always and forever.
Piltdown Perry, I am not mean. I ask questions and point out logical fallacies and problems and when fundies babble about things that directly contradict the bible and suddenly I am as mean as a snake. I am very sorry your world view can'st stand up the light of reality. It's almost as bad as realizing you realize you got drunk and went home with the ugly chick at the bar.
Since it would take the sacrafice of a perfect life to buy back the life Adam and Eve lost for us. Whether or not all repented and accepted Jesus when he was on earth, he'd have had to die as a sacrafice in order to fulfill the bargain.
Yeah that doesn't make any sense. Buy it back from who? God was the one who gave it, took it, gave it back and took it again in the first place. And then he let Jesus live. What was bought back? His flesh? His DNA? His spirit? His spirit lived. His flesh disappeared. What was bought back and from whom?
And what bargain? Who agreed to a bargain? Adam and Eve? Us? Who agreed? What were the terms?
i just thought i'd share something if you don't mind.. my conviction in the legitimacy of the society was slowy eroded over a number of years simply by reading the publications and becoming increasingly frustrated at how little the interpretations of prophecy and scripture made sense, added to the complete ineptitude of senior figures in the organisation.. for me, the "glue" that kept everything roughly held together into something that can be called a "faith" was the concept of "increasing light", which as you all know is the principle employed by the society to excuse any mistakes or backtracks that are made.
they routinely flog proverbs 4:18, which as we all know has nothing to do with gradual refinements in understanding when read in context.
regardless of this, the concept managed to keep me loyal to the organisation for quite some time, as i was too fearful to bring it under direct scrutiny.
I do not love hate, for the record.
You sure do spend a lot of time hating people, then.
You're welcome :)
And yeah, all we are doing is speculating. I have no proof. I do know that I have seen people ride a lie they themselves created to the bitter end. He may have been a spy for all we know. Or an sincere as he could be.
All things being equal, the simplest explanation is usually the correct one, he was probably sincere in his conversion.
I still speculate :)
i just thought i'd share something if you don't mind.. my conviction in the legitimacy of the society was slowy eroded over a number of years simply by reading the publications and becoming increasingly frustrated at how little the interpretations of prophecy and scripture made sense, added to the complete ineptitude of senior figures in the organisation.. for me, the "glue" that kept everything roughly held together into something that can be called a "faith" was the concept of "increasing light", which as you all know is the principle employed by the society to excuse any mistakes or backtracks that are made.
they routinely flog proverbs 4:18, which as we all know has nothing to do with gradual refinements in understanding when read in context.
regardless of this, the concept managed to keep me loyal to the organisation for quite some time, as i was too fearful to bring it under direct scrutiny.
A human, how nice!
Too bad you're doomed for your love of hate. Perry won't like you.
Good point Tammy. Ok, other than the new light, I still say he was a free agent looking for a chance to jump up.
the sokal affair.
the paper, transgressing the boundaries: towards a transformative hermeneutics of quantum gravity, was published in science wars in 1996. on the day of publication, sokal announced (in a different paper,) that the article was a hoax.
he said that social text was a pastiche of left-wing cant, fawning references, grandiose quotations, and outright nonsense.
That is a fact that we might as well accept, and dare I say... laugh at.
We do laugh at you, Piltdown Perry. We do.