Steve2 . . . some of your responses totally baffle me.
You accuse the author of having ". . . a vested interest in casting a filthy pile of blankets . . . that range from rape and molestation . . . " on the WTS . . . and then project the blame to external social influences. You then lambast the author again for not launching a one-man campaign, appealing to the golden chalice of "South African law" and not providing slabs of evidence for your own personal judicial mental construct.
Why do these practices need to become "more prevalent than among other religious sectors" before they are considered unacceptable. We know these practices are prevalent among JW's . . . and this man's personal account simply confirms, that in this particular country, things are no different . . . possibly worse.
I certainly don't accept that the authors motive is to "tantalise readers for their amusement." I for one am neither shocked, tantalised, nor amused. And when did South Africa leave the "western world" . . . they're a long way west of NZ.
I feel that there are a number of self-appointed, pseudo-intellectual, self-aggrandising posters here, who see certain subjects (and posters) as merely a stage for their contra-by-default, attention-seeking dissent.
Just remember this . . . the greatest ally to those that have suffered at the hands of the WTS . . . is that in telling their story, nobody believed them. They couldn't provide "satisfactory" proof. Perhaps you would like him to produce his "two witnesses?"