We're back to this topic again PSon? As I said, NOTHING will change the minds of those who will not accept that the WTC was a planned attack, NOTHING! You have provided reputable names and what have they provided? SAVING FACE!! In addition they resort to name calling, a sign of immature pesronality. Amazing how they can quote from engineers etc, as their proof, and yet not one of these objectors are IRONWORKERS, so they rely on engineers (who also not ironworkers) that will support their claim!
PS, on the net, type in, 'Pictures of the Structural Core of the WTC.' Check out, 'The WTC Cores As Seen In Construction Photo's.' Also, 'View-911 Research-the Core Structures, and the Big Fema Lie.' What's my point? The THICKNESS of the inner core. Aside from the inner core you have the outside structural core. These non-ironworkers would have me believe that a plane can MELT THICK CORE structural steel floor to floor even to the basement level and make this building collapse as though it was NOT a planned demolition! Sizemak once said, "the buildings all fell as a result of the intial aircraft impacts." If single plane caused this type of horrific damage, it is totally awesome. PS, when it comes to SAVING FACE, everything and anything will suffice to explain their PLANNED view, it's a great DISTRACTION!They are NOT ironworkers.
1975