Hi Mark, my fine fellow Texas apostate
You said:
If somehow, you could murder people without hurting them or anyone, we wouldn't call it evil, now would we? I know, sounds silly, but the point is made.
Actually, if I grasp your point, we still would call it evil in my opinion. As an example, whether the Nazis gave painless injections to the Jews to exterminate them, as opposed to methods they did use, we would still call it genocide, wouldn't we? Wouldn't we condemn murder, painless or not, as evil?
You said:
bad, evil....whatever, for what it is worth, your athiest professor was right, it is human opinion that hurting others is wrong*.
Why is hurting others to further your personal agenda univerally considered wrong though? That was the point I was making. Why is that? Who set this standard?