This cult loves to play with semantics. They could argue that a unanimous decision doesn’t necessarily mean a unanimous vote. The vote could be part of the process inreaching the unanimous decision and a two third majority vote was part of the process the holy spirit employed. They all unanimously yielded once this majority was reached. The idea of a first century GB is a completely misinterpretation of the bible and the conclusions made from that conjecture is also completely dishonest. The way the phrase “unanimous decision” is used is also devious as there could be an alternative interpretation of that phrase.
Thanks for posting this Cedars. This brochure is like reading a summary of the book "Bearing Thorough Witness About God's Kingdom".